2021
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The association of pregnancy control, emotions, and beliefs with pregnancy desires: A new perspective on pregnancy intentions

Abstract: Context Standard pregnancy intentions measures do not always align with how people approach pregnancy. Studies that have investigated beyond a binary framework found that those with “ambivalent” feelings towards pregnancy are less likely to use contraception consistently, but the reasons for this are unclear. We sought to gain a nuanced understanding of pregnancy desires, and how perceptions about pregnancy are associated with contraceptive use. Methods We used non-probability quota sampling based on sex, ag… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This research has shown that many people do not plan the timing of their pregnancies, their desired number of children, or other facets of their reproductive lives in the concrete and explicit ways in which researchers attempt to measure them ( Aiken et al 2016 ; Arteaga, Caton, and Gomez 2018 ; Rocca et al 2019 ). Qualitative and quantitative studies have both provided robust evidence that just because a person is not actively seeking a pregnancy does not mean that they would not welcome one ( Yeatman and Smith-Greenaway 2021 ; Huber et al 2017 ; Speizer 2006 ; Johnson-Hanks 2002 ; Gómez et al 2019 ; Manze et al 2021 ; Gomez et al 2018 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This research has shown that many people do not plan the timing of their pregnancies, their desired number of children, or other facets of their reproductive lives in the concrete and explicit ways in which researchers attempt to measure them ( Aiken et al 2016 ; Arteaga, Caton, and Gomez 2018 ; Rocca et al 2019 ). Qualitative and quantitative studies have both provided robust evidence that just because a person is not actively seeking a pregnancy does not mean that they would not welcome one ( Yeatman and Smith-Greenaway 2021 ; Huber et al 2017 ; Speizer 2006 ; Johnson-Hanks 2002 ; Gómez et al 2019 ; Manze et al 2021 ; Gomez et al 2018 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ambivalence with regards to parenthood may lead to inconsistent contraceptive use [ 71 ] and may explain the incidence rate that reaches 19 pregnancies per 100 person-years, which was higher than that observed among women with a negative intention. Women who are ambivalent may also have the impression that pregnancy is predetermined or the result of fate [ 72 ]. Women with such an attitude towards pregnancy are less likely to use contraception consistently.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Categorizing pregnancy desires is complex and current measurements of unintended pregnancy have limitations, which have led researchers to explore new ways of assessing pregnancy intention. [1][2][3][4] Regardless of these measurement limitations, births resulting from unintended pregnancies are associated with negative maternal and child health outcomes, 5,6 and unintended pregnancy remains a widely used metric for benchmarking health promotion and disease prevention. 7 Unintended pregnancy has been shown to be higher in the United States (US) military population compared to the civilian population.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%