2021
DOI: 10.3389/fped.2021.760996
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Association of Maternal Emotional Status With Child Over-Use of Electronic Devices During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Abstract: The quarantine during the COVID-19 pandemic may generate high levels of maternal depression/anxiety, and maternal emotional status may affect child behavioral development. Online education during the pandemic may induce child over-use of electronic-devices. However, child electronic-device over-use (especially among children under 12 who are immature in physical and mental development) during the pandemic has not attracted sufficient attention, and the association of child over-use with maternal emotional stat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“… Eales, L., Gillespie, S., Alstat, R. A., Ferguson, G. M., & Carlson, S. M. (2021) Children's screen and problematic media use in the United States before and during the COVID-19 pandemic Screen media use; problematic media use, COVID-19, children An ad hoc questionnaire was developed for the present study; adapted versions of the Common Sense Census (CSC; Rideout and Robb, 2017 ); Measure of Problematic Media Use - Short Form ( Domoff et al., 2019 ). Guo, X., Zhou, Y., Xu, J., Hu, Y., & Liu, Z. (2021) The Association of Maternal Emotional Status With Child Over-Use of Electronic Devices During the COVID-19 Pandemic COVID-19 pandemic, maternal depression, maternal anxiety, child electronic devices over-use, media, family environment An ad hoc questionnaire was developed for the present study; Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS; Zung, 1965 ); Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS; Zung, 1971 ); Family Environment Scale (FES-CV; Phillips, 1999 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“… Eales, L., Gillespie, S., Alstat, R. A., Ferguson, G. M., & Carlson, S. M. (2021) Children's screen and problematic media use in the United States before and during the COVID-19 pandemic Screen media use; problematic media use, COVID-19, children An ad hoc questionnaire was developed for the present study; adapted versions of the Common Sense Census (CSC; Rideout and Robb, 2017 ); Measure of Problematic Media Use - Short Form ( Domoff et al., 2019 ). Guo, X., Zhou, Y., Xu, J., Hu, Y., & Liu, Z. (2021) The Association of Maternal Emotional Status With Child Over-Use of Electronic Devices During the COVID-19 Pandemic COVID-19 pandemic, maternal depression, maternal anxiety, child electronic devices over-use, media, family environment An ad hoc questionnaire was developed for the present study; Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS; Zung, 1965 ); Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS; Zung, 1971 ); Family Environment Scale (FES-CV; Phillips, 1999 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible to summarize the various contributions in this article by following a few main themes: the psychological and physical outcomes of using and owning technological gadgets during COVID-19 ( Adachi et al., 2022 ; Camerini et al., 2022 ; Chen et al., 2021 ; Chen et al., 2022 ; Cowan et al., 2021 ; Guo et al., 2021 ; Hmidan, 2022 ; Limone and Toto, 2021 ; Werling et al., 2021a ; Serra et al., 2021 ); behavioral problems related to overuse of media during COVID-19 ( Li et al., 2021b ; Marfua, 2021 ); the relationship between eating and sleeping disorders and the use of media during the pandemic ( Kamaleddine et al., 2022 ; Kim et al., 2022 ; Kotrla Topić et al., 2021 ); the effect of media in groups of clinical and ADHD children ( Sciberras et al., 2022 ; Shuai et al., 2021 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The high chi-square ( 2 = 438,843) shows that the answers of the respondents are significantly differently distributed. 19.0% of research participants fully disagree with the set item (2.0%), or disagree (17.0%), while 34.5% agree with the item (25.1%), or fully agree (9.4%). The chi-square is very high ( 2 = 262,497), which means that the answers of the respondents are statistically significantly differently distributed.…”
Section: Research Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%