2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2019.05.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The association of leg length and offset reconstruction after total hip arthroplasty with clinical outcomes

Abstract: Background: Restoring native hip anatomy and biomechanics is important to create a well-functioning hip arthroplasty. This study investigated the association of hip offset and leg length after hip arthroplasty with clinical outcomes, including patient reported outcome measures, the Trendelenburg Test and gait analysis. Methods: In 77 patients undergoing primary hip arthroplasty for osteoarthritis (age mean=65 SD=11 years; BMI mean=27 SD=5 kg/m 2), hip offset and leg length discrepancy were measured on anteropo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study has some limitations and strengths. Leg length discrepancy after THA has been discussed as a cause of gait deviations [ 40 ]. In this analysis, we have not included this factor since leg length was measured on CT scans at the pelvis level, not on the total leg.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study has some limitations and strengths. Leg length discrepancy after THA has been discussed as a cause of gait deviations [ 40 ]. In this analysis, we have not included this factor since leg length was measured on CT scans at the pelvis level, not on the total leg.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several inertial sensor systems have been described in the last decade [16]. While most studies on OA using inertial sensor systems have focused on knee OA, a few studies performing measurements with inertial sensor systems in patients with hip OA have reported spatiotemporal parameters [6,9,10,17,18], but none of these captured joint kinematics. Among inertial sensor systems, the RehaGait® system has been shown to provide reliable data that are comparable to an instrumented treadmill and camera-based system for measuring spatiotemporal parameters and lower limb kinematics in younger and older healthy subjects as well as in patients with knee OA and lumbar spinal stenosis [19][20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Innmann et al demonstrated that patients undergoing THA who had accurate hip offset reconstruction and balanced leg length had significantly higher Harris Hip Scores (P ¼ .029) [3]. In addition, there were worse Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores in patients that had undercorrected femoral offset [1,2]. We found that the FF technique significantly improves the accuracy of the hip center of rotation, femoral offset, and leg length.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…The principal study question we sought to address was whether FF workflow would improve biomechanical hip reconstruction in comparison to the traditional AF workflow. Previous studies have reported increased femoral offset to result in leg lengthening, which can lead to a perceived leg length discrepancy and impaired function [1]. In a systematic review, De Fine et al found a statistically significant correlation between femoral offset restoration and reduction of conventional ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene wear [5].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%