2011
DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.11061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The association between tumour density and prostate cancer recurrence following radical prostatectomy

Abstract: Purpose: Tumour density (TD) may be an independent prognostic factor in men with prostate cancer. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association between prostate cancer TD and recurrence following radical prostatectomy. Materials and Methods: Between 1995 and 2007, 645 patients from The Ottawa Hospital or Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center who had cancer and prostate volumes measured from radical prostatectomy specimens. Tumour density was defined as the relative tumour to prostate volume (tumou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(31 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These histopathological properties are informative, as Gleason grade, tumor volume, tumor cellular density, microvessel density, presence of cribriform and intraductal carcinoma, and tumors arising in the peripheral zone are all features associated with increased likelihood of disease recurrence following surgery 26–31 . As such, these pathological observations further suggest that tumor mpMRI visibility may have genuine prognostic utility.…”
Section: Supportive Evidencementioning
confidence: 96%
“…These histopathological properties are informative, as Gleason grade, tumor volume, tumor cellular density, microvessel density, presence of cribriform and intraductal carcinoma, and tumors arising in the peripheral zone are all features associated with increased likelihood of disease recurrence following surgery 26–31 . As such, these pathological observations further suggest that tumor mpMRI visibility may have genuine prognostic utility.…”
Section: Supportive Evidencementioning
confidence: 96%
“…Certainly, there are limitations particularly that the methodology for calculating volume was not standardized nor was their independent review; there was also limited follow-up and patients were not contiguous. 1 It is arguable that these may not have affected the final results, but they certainly detracted from their generalizability.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One cannot argue with the authors that tumour volume measurement in prostate cancer as a stand-alone tool is unclear. 1 Yet methods for calculating tumour volume are variable from the "eye of the pathologist" to more sophisticated digital methods. The use of volumetric analysis is now welldescribed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations