The association between sleep bruxism and awake bruxism: Polysomnographic and electromyographic recordings in women with and without myofascial pain

Chattrattrai, Thiprawee; Lobbezoo, Frank; Raphael, Karen G.

doi:10.1111/joor.13468

Cited by 5 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Although various criteria for EMG waveform selection have been used in previous studies on d-AB [16][17][18][19][20][21]32], no established criteria were available. Therefore, we adopted the criteria commonly used for SB in this study.…”

Section: Emg Waveform Analysesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Actual state of the diurnal masseteric electromyogram: Differences between awareness and non-awareness of awake bruxism

Ishimaru,

Yamaguchi,

Saito

et al. 2024

J Prosthodont Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Bruxism involves repetitive jaw muscle activity, characterized by tooth clenching or grinding, which can occur during sleep and wakefulness. It is considered a risk factor for various dental diseases, including masticatory muscle pain, temporomandibular joint pain, extreme mechanical tooth wear, orofacial pain, and failed dental restorative treatments[1-5]. The American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) has established clinical diagnostic criteria for sleep bruxism (SB) based on interviews, clinical findings, and electromyography (EMG) assessment criteria. In diurnal awake bruxism (d-AB), the habit of clenching teeth during the day has long been a subject of speculation, and tooth-contacting habits have recently received attention from researchers[6]. The importance of appropriate treatment J Prosthodont Res. 2024; **(**):

show abstract

Section: Emg Waveform Analysesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Actual state of the diurnal masseteric electromyogram: Differences between awareness and non-awareness of awake bruxism

Ishimaru,

Yamaguchi,

Saito

et al. 2024

J Prosthodont Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The relationship between TMD and bruxism is complex and controversial [19][20][21]. Nevertheless, if muscle activity exceeds physiologic tolerance, breakdown in the stomatognathic system may occur and induce orofacial pain and TMD [22][23][24].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The continuous adverse impact of COVID-19 on temporomandibular disorders and bruxism: comparison of pre- during- and post-pandemic time periods

Shalev-Antsel,

Winocur-Arias,

Friedman-Rubin

et al. 2023

BMC Oral Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction Some of the conditions affected by the COVID-19 pandemic were Temporomandibular Disorders (TMD) and bruxism. The present study compares the effect of the pandemic on TMD and bruxism (sleep and awake) in three time periods: before the pandemic (pre-COV), during the pandemic (during-COV) and after the pandemic subsided (post-COVR). Material and Methods A total of 587 adult patients (108 in the pre-COV group, 180 in the during-COV group and 252 in the post-COVR group) who arrived for a routine dental treatment between October 2018 and January 2023 were evaluated according to Axis I diagnosis of the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD). Each patient received a DC/TMD Axis I diagnosis as follows: (i) Painful TMD (defined by the presence of at least one of the following - local myalgia, myofascial pain with referral, arthralgia or headache attributed to TMD); (ii) Non painful TMD (defined by the presence of disc displacement with/without reduction, degenerative joint disorders and/or dislocation), (iii) Possible sleep bruxism (SB) and/or (iv) Possible awake bruxism (AB). Statistical methods Logistic regression analyses were conducted to establish the impact of time and gender on the prospects of painful TMD, non-painful TMD, SB and AB. Results The odds of subjects to be diagnosed with painful TMD at the post-COVR era were 3.3 times higher compared to the pre-pandemic time period (pre-COV, 95% C.I. 1.438–7.585). The odds of subjects to be diagnosed with non-painful TMD during-COV were 4 times higher compared to the pre-COV era (95% C.I. 1.332–12.542). The odds of subjects to present possible SB at post-COVR were 2.7 times higher compared to pre-pandemic (pre-COV, 95% C.I. 1.258–5.889, p < 0.05) and the odds to present possible AB after the pandemic subsided (post-COVR) were 3.2 times compared to the pre-pandemic period (95% C.I. 1.496–6.949). The odds of female subjects to be diagnosed with either painful or non-painful TMD were 3.7–4.4 times higher, compared to males. Conclusions Results indicate that with regard to TMD and bruxism the pandemic adverse effects persist also after COVID-19 subsides and the restrictions caused by it are abolished. Apparently, during the pandemic females were affected more seriously by painful and non-painful TMD than males.

show abstract

Botulinum toxins for sleep bruxism

Balanta-Melo,

Dallaserra,

Verdugo-Paiva

et al. 2024

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The association between sleep bruxism and awake bruxism: Polysomnographic and electromyographic recordings in women with and without myofascial pain

Cited by 5 publications

References 27 publications

Actual state of the diurnal masseteric electromyogram: Differences between awareness and non-awareness of awake bruxism

Actual state of the diurnal masseteric electromyogram: Differences between awareness and non-awareness of awake bruxism

The continuous adverse impact of COVID-19 on temporomandibular disorders and bruxism: comparison of pre- during- and post-pandemic time periods

Botulinum toxins for sleep bruxism

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About