2016
DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2016.1193477
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The association between ruminative thinking and negative interpretation bias in social anxiety

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(46 reference statements)
4
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the longitudinal effect of angry rumination on hostile attribution bias was marginally significant and the effect was small, it suggested that, to a certain extent, angry rumination can longitudinally predict hostile attribution bias. This finding was partly consistent with previous studies showing that such ruminative thoughts fuel biased negative interpretations [30]. On the other hand, the question of whether the longitudinal effect of angry rumination on existing hostile attribution bias warrants further exploration.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Although the longitudinal effect of angry rumination on hostile attribution bias was marginally significant and the effect was small, it suggested that, to a certain extent, angry rumination can longitudinally predict hostile attribution bias. This finding was partly consistent with previous studies showing that such ruminative thoughts fuel biased negative interpretations [30]. On the other hand, the question of whether the longitudinal effect of angry rumination on existing hostile attribution bias warrants further exploration.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Collectively, these findings suggest that both negative interpretation inflexibility and negative interpretation bias are involved in emotion regulation difficulties in response to positive emotions. Through this suggestion, the present studies significantly extend earlier research, which has mainly focused on the relation between interpretation of ambiguity and the use of strategies to downregulate negative emotions (Badra et al, 2017;Everaert, Grahek, et al, 2017;Mor et al, 2014;Wisco et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…In light of prior research, it was expected that interpretation biases would be related to emotion regulation strategy use (Badra et al, 2017;Everaert, Grahek, et al, 2017;Mor et al, 2014;Wisco et al, 2014) as well as symptoms of depression and social anxiety (Everaert et al, 2018;Everaert, Podina, et al, 2017;Hirsch et al, 2016). 1 By examining these hypotheses, the present study was expected to shed light on the cognitive mechanisms that may give rise to maladaptive profiles of emotion regulation strategy use in individuals with psychopathology.…”
Section: The Present Investigationmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using a variety of methods, interpretation bias has been documented in both socially anxious adults (Amir, Beard, & Bower, 2005;Amir et al, 2012;Badra et al, 2016;Chen, Milne, Dayman, & Kemps, 2018;Huppert, Foa, Furr, Filip, & Mathews, 2003) and socially anxious adolescents (Giannini & Loscalzo, 2016;Gonzalez et al, 2017;Haller, Raeder, Scerif, Cohen Kadosh, & Lau, 2016;Miers et al, 2008). One frequent approach to observing interpretation bias is the homograph/homophone paradigm.…”
Section: Interpretation Bias: a Cognitive Process Linked To Social Anmentioning
confidence: 99%