The association between risky decision making and attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptoms: A preregistered assessment of need for cognition as underlying mechanism

Abstract

Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is related to suboptimal decision making in experimental tasks and to real-life risk-taking behavior (RTB) such as substance abuse and unsafe traffic conduct. In this preregistered study, we tested whether these associations are mediated by need for cognition-the extent to which one tends towards, and enjoys, analytical thought. In a large sample of young adults (N = 463, M age = 19.7 years), we tested whether need for cognition mediated the association between self-reported ADHD symptoms on the one hand and decisionmaking strategy complexity on an experimental gambling task and self-reported reallife RTB on the other hand. Preregistered confirmatory analyses indicated first that ADHD symptoms were positively associated with real-life RTB, but the association was not mediated by need for cognition. Second, ADHD symptoms were not related to decision-making strategy complexity, and need for cognition was not a significant mediator. Explorative analyses revealed that (a) need for cognition was associated with higher decision-making accuracy and slower reaction time; (b) need for cognition was related to inattentive but not to hyperactive/impulsive ADHD symptoms; (c) need for cognition was associated with health-related RTB but not interpersonal RTB; and (4) only the association between inattention and health-related RTB was mediated by need for cognition. We conclude that need for cognition is not a mediator in the association between ADHD symptoms and RTB. Additionally, we conclude that neither ADHD symptoms nor need for cognition predict decision-making strategy complexity. Implications for both future research and clinical practice are discussed.

Does Mind-Wandering Explain ADHD-Related Impairment in Adolescents?

“…To measure risk-taking behavior, the self-reported risktaking behavior questionnaire was administered [16,62]. This questionnaire was based on three existing questionnaires: the risk taking behavior questionnaire [49], the adolescent version of the Domain-Specific Risk-Taking scale (DOSPERT) [6] and the Adolescent Risk Taking Inventory (AdoRTI) [27].…”

On the robustness of the brand positivity effect: Is impulsivity a moderator of overly favorable judgments and choices of focal options?

“…Conversely, the Brand Positivity Effect may generally characterize judgments and decisions and be observed across individuals and choice contexts regardless of the tendency to be impulsive. Generally, research exploring the potential role of individual differences in decision making is important in understanding choice phenomena as well as the nature of potential moderators (Zadelaar et al, 2020).…”