The Association Between App-Administered Depression Assessments and Suicidal Ideation in User Comments: Retrospective Observational Study

Abstract

Background Many people use apps to help understand and manage their depression symptoms. App-administered questionnaires for the symptoms of depression, such as the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, are easy to score and implement in an app, but may not be accompanied by essential resources and access needed to provide proper support and avoid potential harm. Objective Our primary goal was to evaluate the differences in risks and helpfulness associated with using an app to self-diagnose depression, comparing assessment-only apps with multifeatured apps. We also investigated whether, what, and how additional app features may mitigate potential risks. Methods In this retrospective observational study, we identified apps in the Google Play store that provided a depression assessment as a feature and had at least five user comments. We separated apps into two categories based on those having only a depression assessment versus those that offered additional supportive features. We conducted theoretical thematic analyses over the user reviews, with thematic coding indicating the helpfulness of the app, the presence of suicidal ideation, and how and why the apps were used. We compared the results across the two categories of apps and analyzed the differences using chi-square statistical tests. Results We evaluated 6 apps; 3 provided only a depression assessment (assessment only), and 3 provided features in addition to self-assessment (multifeatured). User comments for assessment-only apps indicated significantly more suicidal ideation or self-harm (n=31, 9.4%) compared to comments for multifeatured apps (n=48, 2.3%; X21=43.88, P<.001). Users of multifeatured apps were over three times more likely than assessment-only app users to comment in favor of the app’s helpfulness, likely due to features like mood tracking, journaling, and informational resources (n=56, 17% vs n=1223, 59% respectively; X21=200.36, P<.001). The number of users under the age of 18 years was significantly higher among assessment-only app users (n=40, 12%) than multifeatured app users (n=9, 0.04%; X21=189.09, P<.001). Conclusions Apps that diagnose depression by self-assessment without context or other supportive features are more likely to be used by those under 18 years of age and more likely to be associated with increased user distress and potential harm. Depression self-assessments in apps should be implemented with caution and accompanied by evidence-based capabilities that establish proper context, increase self-empowerment, and encourage users to seek clinical diagnostics and outside help.

Symptoms and syndromes associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection and severity in pregnant women from two community cohorts

“…These data can inform public-health policies, enhance the speed of the healthcare response, shape the community services, and alert the general population to urgent health threats 16 . Smartphone applications (apps) were used prior to the COVID-19 pandemic to remotely advise on prenatal health, and maternal health behaviours, including gestational weight gain and smoking cessation 17 . Many eHealth initiatives were launched at the onset of the pandemic, with most using single, cross-sectional reporting methods to inform SARS-CoV-2 epidemiology 18 .…”

The growing field of interdisciplinary research on user comments: A computational scoping review

“…In the field of psychology, the reflection on effects of UCs ranges from the negative impact that cyberbullying on SNSs has on children (Alsehaima and Alanazi, 2018) to the occurrence of the bystander effect in UCs and how to deal with it (Naab et al, 2018). Mental health and well-being also play an important role here (DeForte et al, 2020) as well as the effect of UCs on users’ perception of, for example, the tentativeness of research findings (Feinkohl et al, 2016).…”