2014
DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1307403r
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Association between Air Pollution and Subclinical Atherosclerosis: Rivera et al. Respond

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In light of these data, therefore, we next hypothesized that perhaps some of these genes (across all 3 exposure models) would be linked to relevant human disease outcomes already known to be exacerbated/modulated by air pollution— e.g. , heart disease [ 60 , 61 ], atherosclerosis [ 62 64 ], stroke [ 65 , 66 ], cancers [ 67 69 ], etc .—among various other disease contexts. Indeed, biocomputational profiling (Figure 3 ) confirmed that 11 of our 27 hits (~41%) were in fact highly associated with a wealth of PM-linked pathophysiological conditions (and to many other varied diseases), thereby underscoring that these genes may serve as an epigenetic/signaling nexus of exposure-related signals in vivo , a role not fully appreciated among their other biological functions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In light of these data, therefore, we next hypothesized that perhaps some of these genes (across all 3 exposure models) would be linked to relevant human disease outcomes already known to be exacerbated/modulated by air pollution— e.g. , heart disease [ 60 , 61 ], atherosclerosis [ 62 64 ], stroke [ 65 , 66 ], cancers [ 67 69 ], etc .—among various other disease contexts. Indeed, biocomputational profiling (Figure 3 ) confirmed that 11 of our 27 hits (~41%) were in fact highly associated with a wealth of PM-linked pathophysiological conditions (and to many other varied diseases), thereby underscoring that these genes may serve as an epigenetic/signaling nexus of exposure-related signals in vivo , a role not fully appreciated among their other biological functions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,9) 1.25 2.9 10 −6 1.7 0.084 0.0 0.0091 7.954 8.026 7.882 Kepler-78 b 10,11) 0.81 -10 −11 1.9 0.0089 0.0 10 −5 0.341 0.341 0.341 Kepler-11 b 5,12,13) 0.95 6 − 10 10 −6 1.9 0.091 0.0 0.0051 10.287 10.340 10.235 Kepler-42 c 4,5) 0.13 -10 −10 1.9 0.0060 0. 0 16) 0.33 > 2 10 −6 5.6 0.0505 0.13 10 −5 7.216 6.62 GJ 433 b 28) 0.48 -10 −6 5.8 0.058 0.08 0.0001 7.364 7.103 HD1461 c 29) 1.08 -10 −5 5.9 0.1117 0.0 0.0052 13.121 13.189 13.053 Kepler-305 c 7) 0.76 -10 −6 6.0 0.0732 0.0 0.0007 8.298 8.304 8.292 GJ 581 d 14) 0.31 7 − 9 10 −2 6.0 0.22 0.25 0.0012 67.692 53.918 Continued on next page 32) 0.87 < 7 10 −7 6.4 0.047 0.16 0.0003 3.990 3.534 Kepler-114 b 7) 0.56 -10 −6 6.5 0.048 0.0 0.0001 5.133 5.133 5.132 Koi-82 b 8) 0.799 -10 −5 6.6 0.116 0.0 0.0025 16.144 16.184 16.104 HD 40307 c 18) 0.77 4.5 10 −5 6.6 0.0799 0.06 0.0009 9.401 9.2 Gl 876 d 33) 0.334 0.1 − 5 10 −8 6.7 0.0208 0.207 10 −6 1.897 1.588 Kepler-18 b 34) 0.972 8 − 12 10 −7 6.9 0.0447 0.0 0.0004 3.501 3.503 3.5 GJ 3634 b 35) 0.45 -10…”
Section: Discussionunclassified