1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-1694(96)03138-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The assignment of drainage direction over flat surfaces in raster digital elevation models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
216
1
8

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 282 publications
(232 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
216
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The original algorithm is called the D8 flow model, but there have been several advances of this model through time that allow better computation of divergent flows on hillslope, such as the D-1 model (Tarboton, 1997) and the Mass Flux Method (Costa-Cabral and Burges, 1994), as well as flow over flat terrain (Garbrecht and Martz, 1997). For simplicity, we only describe the D8 flow model, which determines the flow direction from every grid cell in a DEM by calculating the steepest downhill slope from a grid cell to the eight surrounding grid cells.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The original algorithm is called the D8 flow model, but there have been several advances of this model through time that allow better computation of divergent flows on hillslope, such as the D-1 model (Tarboton, 1997) and the Mass Flux Method (Costa-Cabral and Burges, 1994), as well as flow over flat terrain (Garbrecht and Martz, 1997). For simplicity, we only describe the D8 flow model, which determines the flow direction from every grid cell in a DEM by calculating the steepest downhill slope from a grid cell to the eight surrounding grid cells.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, after pit removal, both inherent and newly introduced flat surfaces need further processing. Tribe (1992) and Garbrecht & Martz (1997) have proposed elevation modification methods to generate convergent flow patterns over flat areas, and Nogami (1998) presented a random method to process flat areas. However, the elevation increments and hence related drainage slopes in these methods also lack a physical basis.…”
Section: Existing Methods To Treat Pits and Flat Areas In Raw Demsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hutchinson (1989) has proposed an algorithm to create pit free DEMs, but most grid DEMs have not been created by this method (Tribe, 1992). In natural landscapes, particularly in those that are large scale, pits and flat surfaces are relatively rare (Mark, 1984;Garbrecht & Martz, 1997;Tribe, 1992), but in currently available grid DEMs, about 5% of grid points are pits (as found in a preliminary investigation by the authors). It is recognized that pits originate from errors of data collection systems, and/or from horizontal and vertical resolutions of DEMs (O'Callaghan & Mark, 1984).…”
Section: Dem Data Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During pit filling, a surface is formed by filling a pit to some new pour height. This produces a surface through which flow paths can be inferred from the surrounding topography [Garbrecht and Martz, 1997]. Slope tolerances permit flow connections as long as the slope gradient of a cell is below some threshold value.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Features that fail to completely mark during the optimization process after a fixed number of iterations are marked using the lake boundary following algorithm. An alternative solution could use a Gatbrecht and Martz [1997] or a similar algorithm in these areas, since they are identified prior to slope tracking. (Table 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%