The assessment of the relevance of building components and life phases for the environmental profile of nearly zero-energy buildings: life cycle assessment of a multifamily building in Italy

Abstract

Purpose: Since the construction sector is a considerable energy consumer and greenhouse gas (GHG) producer, the EU rules strive to build nearly zero-energy buildings, by reducing the operative energy and yearning for on-site energy production. This article underlines the necessity to go beyond the energy evaluations and move towards the environmental assessment in a life cycle perspective, by comparing the impacts due to building materials and energy production devices. Methods: We compared the operational energy impacts and those of technologies and materials carrying out a life cycle assessment (LCA; ISO 14040, ISO 14044, EN 15643–2, EN 15978) on a nearly zero-energy building (ZEB), a residential complex with 61 apartments in four buildings, situated near Milan (Italy). We consider all life cycle phases, including production, transport, building site activities, use and maintenance; the materials inventory was filled out collecting data from invoices paid, building site reports, construction drawings and product data sheets. To make the assessment results comparable, we set a functional unit of 1 m2 of net floor area in 1 year (1 m2y), upon a lifespan of 100 years. The environmental data were acquired from Ecoinvent 2.2. Results and discussion: The results highlight the important role of the pre-use and maintenance phases in building life so that in a nearly ZEB, the environmental impacts linked to the use are no longer the major proportion: the pre-use phase accounts for 56 %, while the operative energy is only 31 % of the total. For this reason, if the environmental assessment of the case study was shrunk to the operational consumption, only one third of the impacts would be considered. The consumption of non-renewable resources after 100 years are 193,950 GJ (133.5 kWh/m2y); the GHG emissions are 15,300 t (37.8 kg of CO2 eq/m2y). In the pre-use phase, structures have the major impacts (50 %) and the load of system components is unexpectedly high (12 %) due to the ambition of on-site energy production. Conclusions: Paying attention to the operative energy consumption seems to address to only one third of the environmental impacts of buildings: the adoption of LCA as a tool to guide the design choices could help to identify the solution which ensures the lowest overall impact on the whole life, balancing the options of reducing the energy requirements, the on-site production from renewable sources and the limitation of the impacts due to building components (simpler and more durable)

Quantitative Study on the Life-Cycle Carbon Emissions of a Nearly Zero Energy Building in the Severe Cold Zones of China

“…The second type of carbon accounting that places special emphasis on the product has some limitations in regional carbon emissions accounting. [37]. This reference conducts a statistical study of 70 references related to carbon emissions worldwide [38].…”

Comparing Three Building Life Cycle Assessment Tools for the Canadian Construction Industry

“…The research proved that as buildings are becoming more efficient and using significantly less operational energy over its life time, embodied energy plays a greater role. (Paleari, Lavagna, & Campioli, 2016) Another typical use for whole building life cycle assessment in research is to compare a baseline building and an improved or upgraded building to demonstrate the percent embodied energy or carbon savings the projected is projected to save in compared to a typical new build. The Athena Sustainable Materials Institute has completed a number of studies like this, such as the UBC Biological Sciences Complex Renew project, which proved that the building avoided the consumption of 4 million liters of water, 24,000 gigajoules of fossil fuels, and 13,000 tonnes of materials by renovating rather than demolishing and building new (Athena Sustainable Materials Institute, 2011).…”

Life cycle GHG assessment of magnetic bearing and oil lubricated bearing water cooled chillers

“…Research on manufacturing systems of various products (Cascini et al, 2016;Di Lullo et al, 2016;Mahbub et al, 2018;Sproesser et al, 2015;Wong et al, 2016) are abundant. Sustainability assessments of chiller manufacturing and product life cycle, however, have been primarily focused on economic and building energy systems (Collinge et al, 2013;Osman & Ries, 2007;Paleari et al, 2016). A study found that electricity used by the chiller dominates a majority of the GHG associated with the life cycle analysis of chiller (Calm, 1999).…”