1971
DOI: 10.1007/bf00337571
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The assessment of the intracranial part of the internal carotid artery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
4
2

Year Published

1989
1989
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The differences between the results obtained from the cadaveric data and our intraoperative and radiological observations may be caused by the shrunken state of the major artery at autopsy. Chrzanowski14 reported ICA angles ranging from 20-43 degrees (average 31.5 degrees), which was also smaller than the ones measured in our study (44.7± 0.3 degree).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 86%
“…The differences between the results obtained from the cadaveric data and our intraoperative and radiological observations may be caused by the shrunken state of the major artery at autopsy. Chrzanowski14 reported ICA angles ranging from 20-43 degrees (average 31.5 degrees), which was also smaller than the ones measured in our study (44.7± 0.3 degree).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 86%
“…Chrzanowski (4) reported that the ICA angle (angle B in our study) ranges from 20 to 43 degrees (average, 31.5 degrees) in 100 normal subjects, which is smaller than those measured in the control group of our study (51.6 Ϯ 10.8 degrees). This might reflect the differences in population used in the 2 studies.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 74%
“…1963; Michailow, 1964; Bergland et al. 1968; Chrzanowski, 1971; Jovanovic, 1971; Hasso et al. 1975; Knosp et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In adults, several attempts were made to provide objective shape definitions by measuring the angles of the knees of the carotid siphon (Michailow, 1964; Chrzanowski, 1971). These measurements are usually based on lateral (two‐dimensional, 2D) projections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation