2006
DOI: 10.1080/02602930500262403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The assessment of student PowerPoint presentations—attempting the impossible?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The table shows that half the students welcomed group work, or had very positive feelings towards it. This is despite problems of dissatisfaction that often arise from the assessment of group work (see for example Chapman et al, 2006;Dobson, 2006). In fact only 5.4 per cent of the sample said they "hated" group work and less than one in five indicated that they would prefer not to engage in group work for assignments.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The table shows that half the students welcomed group work, or had very positive feelings towards it. This is despite problems of dissatisfaction that often arise from the assessment of group work (see for example Chapman et al, 2006;Dobson, 2006). In fact only 5.4 per cent of the sample said they "hated" group work and less than one in five indicated that they would prefer not to engage in group work for assignments.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usher (2002) describes a range of transferable skills including collaboration, leadership, taking initiative, problem-solving and creativity. However, one skill not identified by Usher is the ability to present oneself in front of an audience (Dobson, 2006). An assessed presentation in situ provides an opportunity to present information to an audience away from the comfort zone of the classroom.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Dobson has written about his experiences of assessing students using Microsoft PowerPoint presentations and regards them as providing an opportunity for learning through feedback and learning from peers (Dobson, 2006). However, undergraduate student-led seminars tend to follow a familiar but repetitive pattern of delivery using PowerPoint software, student discussion and summary handouts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Oral presentations can be assessed by oneself, peers and by trained professionals. Those three types of assessment have been studied in comparison to each other in different demographic areas, different languages and academic groups [12,13]. Assessment of oral presentations by professionals in the university system should be studied to see if more accurate and transparent grades are given to the students.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%