2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2009.09.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The assessment of risk to recidivate among a juvenile offending population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
105
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
5
105
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Individuals who score as moderate-high or high risk to re-offend are then assessed using the Full Assessment, which contains the following 12 domains: criminal history, gender, school, use of free time, employment, relationships, family and living arrangements, alcohol and drugs, mental health, attitudes/behaviors, aggression, and skills (Baird et al 2013). This assessment has been widely validated as a tool for predicting risk and recidivism (Baglivio 2009(Baglivio , 2014Baglivio and Jackowski 2013). The final sample in this study is comprised of each unique juvenile who had been administered the PACT Full Assessment (n = 64,329 youth) with a mean age of 17 years old (at the time of the last assessment).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individuals who score as moderate-high or high risk to re-offend are then assessed using the Full Assessment, which contains the following 12 domains: criminal history, gender, school, use of free time, employment, relationships, family and living arrangements, alcohol and drugs, mental health, attitudes/behaviors, aggression, and skills (Baird et al 2013). This assessment has been widely validated as a tool for predicting risk and recidivism (Baglivio 2009(Baglivio , 2014Baglivio and Jackowski 2013). The final sample in this study is comprised of each unique juvenile who had been administered the PACT Full Assessment (n = 64,329 youth) with a mean age of 17 years old (at the time of the last assessment).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have an early onset of antisocial conduct and juvenile justice activity often prior to age 10, engage in more varied and severe forms of delinquency and violence, are more prolific, have longer careers and delayed desistance, and have frequent, overlapping, and often unsuccessful involvement in the criminal justice system. Given this extremity, there is a particular focus on the most violent and severe criminals evidenced by increasingly enriched samples of offenders including prison homicide offenders (Cunningham, Sorensen, Vigen, & Woods, 2010), multiple homicide offenders (DeLisi & Scherer, 2006;Wright, Pratt, & DeLisi, 2008), homicide offenders (Jennings & Piquero, 2008), sex offenders (Harris et al, 2009;, and high-risk or serious/violent/chronic juvenile delinquents (Baglivio, 2009;Krebs, Lattimore, Cowell, & Graham, 2010;Mulvey et al, 2010). Indeed, criminologists increasingly suggest that the criminal career paradigm is an appropriate framework for studying the most severe forms of crime (Soothill, Fitzpatrick, & Francis, 2009), an avenue of research that historically was examined by forensic psychiatrists.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, a Total risk score was calculated by adding the total risk scores of the separate domains and a Total protective score was calculated by adding the total protective scores of the separate domains. The predictive validity of the WSJCA pre-screen and the slightly adapted tools (Positive Achievement Change Tool [PACT] pre-screen and Youth Assessment and Screening Instrument [YASI] pre-screen) were examined in four different studies (Baglivio, 2009;Barnoski, 2004a;Orbis Partners Inc., 2007;Van der Put et al, 2013). The Barnoski (2004a) study examined the extent to which the WSJCA pre-screen was able to predict 18-month recidivism (defined as convictions).…”
Section: Instruments and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%