2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.03.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The assessment of households' recycling costs: The role of personal motives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
105
2
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
5
105
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The importance of non-monetary incentives in waste recycling has already been emphasized in literature (Berglund, 2006;Brekke et al 2003Brekke et al , 2007Brekke et al , 2010Hage et al 2009;Halvorsen, 2008). Kinnaman (2006) indeed suggests that the benefits of recycling households are increased more by warm-glow incentives than by unit-based pricing, to the point that households may even be willing to pay for the opportunity to recycle 7 .…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of non-monetary incentives in waste recycling has already been emphasized in literature (Berglund, 2006;Brekke et al 2003Brekke et al , 2007Brekke et al , 2010Hage et al 2009;Halvorsen, 2008). Kinnaman (2006) indeed suggests that the benefits of recycling households are increased more by warm-glow incentives than by unit-based pricing, to the point that households may even be willing to pay for the opportunity to recycle 7 .…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5, the results regarding influence of education level on recycling are not consistent. Correlations have been reported with years of schooling and future higher education [9,21,22,25,26,29,30,33,35], but a [7,24,31,32,38,39].…”
Section: Socio-demographic Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5). Those reporting any dependence between gender and recycling behaviour include Barr et al [22], Meneses and Palasio [24], Saphores et al [25], Ekere et al [38], and the majority have found no significant correlation [7,[26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33].…”
Section: Socio-demographic Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations