2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.06.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The assessment of hemispheric lateralization in functional MRI—Robustness and reproducibility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
209
0
9

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 204 publications
(220 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
209
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…To define our ROI's, we started from masked t-maps. To take inter-subject variability into account, we adjusted the threshold for the activation pixels for each subject using a technique that was introduced earlier by a number of other authors in order to improve the robustness of lateralization measures [22,33,35]. For each amygdala, we calculated a mean maximum t defined as the mean of the 5% highest t-values.…”
Section: Image Acquisition and Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To define our ROI's, we started from masked t-maps. To take inter-subject variability into account, we adjusted the threshold for the activation pixels for each subject using a technique that was introduced earlier by a number of other authors in order to improve the robustness of lateralization measures [22,33,35]. For each amygdala, we calculated a mean maximum t defined as the mean of the 5% highest t-values.…”
Section: Image Acquisition and Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By using the WFU PickAtlas Tool Version, 2.4 (Maldjian et al, 2003), we defined maskvolumes which masked all brain activations except those in the left or right Cg25 7 containing both activated and non-activated voxels in proportions depending on the general activity level of each individual. To take this inter-subject variability into account, we adjusted the threshold for the activation pixels for each subject using a technique that was introduced earlier by a number of other authors in order to improve the robustness of lateralization measures (Fernández et al, 2001;Knecht et al, 2003;Jansen et al, 2006). In a first step, we calculated the means of the 5% highest T-values in the left and right Cg25 regions as defined by the mask.…”
Section: Image Acquisition and Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…31 Different methods for calculating LI have been used for determination of language dominance by fMRI. 50 For this study, we used calculations of a regional LI for the region of interest pairs Broca/BR and Wernicke/WR to achieve reliable and more detailed information compared with a global LI calculation. Furthermore, for the determination of language dominance, it has been shown that regional LI correlates better with the results of Wada testing compared with global LI, which is based on voxel counts of the complete hemisphere.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%