1989
DOI: 10.1300/j018v08n03_02
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Assessment of Everyday Functioning Using the Present Functioning Questionnaire and the Functional Rating Scale in Elderly Samples

Abstract: ABSTRACI'. Two methods for obtaining estimates of everyday functioning in elderly patients were described: the Present Functioning Questionnaire (PFQ) and the Functional Rating Scale (FRS). The PFQ obtains information from a collaborative informant with respect to number of reported problems in five areas of everyday functioning: personality; everyday tasks; language skills; memory functioning; and self-care. The FRS integrates assessment information from multidisciplinary sources in eight areas crucial to the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All patients had detailed clinical evaluations at inception and subsequent visits, including: (1) the Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE) [18] -used as a general measure of cognitive impairment, (2) the Functional Rating Scale (FRS) [19,20] -used as a measure of global severity of dementia, and (3) the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS) [21,22] -used to assess co-morbid medical conditions. Other assessments, where there were available informants, included the Disability Assessment for Dementia (DAD) [23] , and the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) [24] .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All patients had detailed clinical evaluations at inception and subsequent visits, including: (1) the Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE) [18] -used as a general measure of cognitive impairment, (2) the Functional Rating Scale (FRS) [19,20] -used as a measure of global severity of dementia, and (3) the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS) [21,22] -used to assess co-morbid medical conditions. Other assessments, where there were available informants, included the Disability Assessment for Dementia (DAD) [23] , and the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) [24] .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This checklist included items from the Hachinski Ischemic Score, as well as the California and NINDS-AIREN criteria for VaD [18][19][20]. The Functional Rating Scale (FRS) [21][22][23], a multidomain staging scale derived from the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale [24], was used as a measure of global severity and the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale [25] to evaluate comorbid medical conditions. Informant-based interviews included the Disability Assessment for Dementia (DAD) [26], the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) [27], the Frontotemporal Behavioral Inventory [28], Caregiver Burden Scale [29] and Quality of Life Short Form 36 [30].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also rou tinely obtain information from the patient, family members and other collateral sources to complete the evaluation of functional sta tus. The Functional Rating Scale (FRS), an 8-item instrument that has an interrater reliability ranging from 0.63 to 0.96 with docu mented concurrent validity and discriminant validity [13], is also completed by the multidisciplinary' team for every patient. The rel evant 5-point scales (scores increase with disability) of the FRS that we used for this study are: social and occupational functioning, home and hobbies, and personal care.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%