1984
DOI: 10.1016/0013-7944(84)90096-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The assessment of defects in structures of strain hardening material

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
124
0
5

Year Published

1989
1989
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 420 publications
(130 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
124
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…[13,49] The HEAC properties in Figure 14, from elastoplastic K J analysis of a small specimen, are quantitatively relevant to a structure under elastic loading, following the J-integral approach. [58,60,66,67,[76][77][78] To verify this assertion, it is necessary to demonstrate K and J dominance of crack tip mechanics. [52] K dominance is established by comparing the uncracked SENT ligament (W-a) and plane strain plastic zone diameter (estimated using the Ramberg-Osgood flow properties for Monel K-500) for the deepest crack and high-elastic K of 50 MPaÖm.…”
Section: Mpa√mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13,49] The HEAC properties in Figure 14, from elastoplastic K J analysis of a small specimen, are quantitatively relevant to a structure under elastic loading, following the J-integral approach. [58,60,66,67,[76][77][78] To verify this assertion, it is necessary to demonstrate K and J dominance of crack tip mechanics. [52] K dominance is established by comparing the uncracked SENT ligament (W-a) and plane strain plastic zone diameter (estimated using the Ramberg-Osgood flow properties for Monel K-500) for the deepest crack and high-elastic K of 50 MPaÖm.…”
Section: Mpa√mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can therefore be applied in cases where only linear elastic solutions exist and the Ramberg-Osgood approximation is not suitable. However, since this method relies on certain assumptions of structural behavior in the inelastic range, proper definition of the reference stress is necessary to assure an accurate solution 12 .…”
Section: Reference Stress Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This trend becomes more pronounced as the stress range and plastic contribution to AJf increase. Such behavior can be explained by the dependence of the function hi on the hardening exponent n. The agreement between the two methods can be improved by modifying the reference stress equation 12 .…”
Section: Reference Stress Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a reference load, P o , has been combined with the normalised (h) functions in the EPRI method [19] to define J; for details see [20][21]. The reference load has also been chosen so that fully plastic solutions for power-law materials (such as those in [19]) for different values of hardening exponent n are insensitive to n (Ainsworth [22], Kim et al [23]). The ability to make power-law solutions insensitive to n has been used to justify use of classical limit load solutions as reference loads since these correspond to n→∞.…”
Section: Determination Of the Reference Load F Ymentioning
confidence: 99%