2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejim.2006.12.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The assessment of complexity in internal medicine patients. The FADOI Medicomplex Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
27
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…are less well represented and have a lower number of beds. According to the Literature [17][18][19] Internal Medicine admits mainly complex DRG related to Neurology, Cardiology as well as to the Geriatrics. Older age, together with polypharmacy, non use of formal and/or informal home-help services, history of falls, temporal disorientation, place of living and use of psychoactive drugs contribute significantly to determine the hospital admission through ER.…”
Section: Role Of Internal Medicine In the Management Of Emergency Admmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…are less well represented and have a lower number of beds. According to the Literature [17][18][19] Internal Medicine admits mainly complex DRG related to Neurology, Cardiology as well as to the Geriatrics. Older age, together with polypharmacy, non use of formal and/or informal home-help services, history of falls, temporal disorientation, place of living and use of psychoactive drugs contribute significantly to determine the hospital admission through ER.…”
Section: Role Of Internal Medicine In the Management Of Emergency Admmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, mean CIRS-SI was 1.03 (SD=0.31) and median CIRS-CI was 2 (range 1-5) equivalent to a moderate comorbidity. The mean number of diagnoses at discharge was 5.9 (SD=2.3), the median number of clinical tests performed during hospitalization was 8 (range [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18], and the mean number of medications prescribed at discharge was 8 (SD=3.2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10,11 On the other hand, clinical complexity takes into account different variables, such as number of comorbid conditions, number of daily medications, need for repeated hospitalizations over a given time period. 12 Comorbidity is defined as the coexistence of two or more disease conditions in the same subject, and is typical of the elderly; with advancing age, an increase in age-related chronic degenerative diseases is expected. 13 Comorbidities increase the duration of hospitalization, the need for re-hospitalizations, the incidence of complications and the risk of mortality compared to that of the single disease components.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21,22 In addition to specific organizational pathways, that have to be built together with ED units for diseases at higher risk of acute organ failure as indicated above, it is therefore essential, at the admission in the ward and throughout the course of hospital stay, a widely accepted, easily reproducible risk stratification system (triage) of the patients, to provide the better adequate care related to their actual needs. [23][24][25][26] For this purpose the IM adapted mEWS proved to be a simple and effective tool. 27,28 We share the opinion by Chesi and Nardi, 24 for which the stratification of patients for different clinical risk in IM should not be based only on vital parameters, since there are medical conditions, although with lower scores at admission, that are at higher risk of organ failure or sudden worsening, requiring, regardless of the score at admission, a close clinical monitoring.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%