1999
DOI: 10.1080/10459889909604994
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Assessment Maze: Making Decisions About Alternative Assessments for Students With Disabilities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(19 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They felt that when standardized tests were used alone, they often failed to tap skills that children actually did have in their repertoire. Using only standardized assessments of early language and literacy seemed to limit the teachers' abilities to interact with young children meaningfully and effectively for the purpose of developing their literacyrelated skills and understandings (Daniels, 1999).…”
Section: Building the Bridgementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They felt that when standardized tests were used alone, they often failed to tap skills that children actually did have in their repertoire. Using only standardized assessments of early language and literacy seemed to limit the teachers' abilities to interact with young children meaningfully and effectively for the purpose of developing their literacyrelated skills and understandings (Daniels, 1999).…”
Section: Building the Bridgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The teachers also did not feel that standardized assessments would reflect the children's progress or inform their daily practices as much as needed. To the Bridge builders, authentic assessment meant an approach that would provide information about what children can do in settings where they are most comfortable (Boyd-Batstone, 2004;Daniels, 1999;Neisworth & Bagnato, 2004) and as a way to "capture real-life competencies in everyday settings and document even small improvements in developmental skills" (Bagnato, 2005, p. 18).…”
Section: Building the Bridgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Again in 2002, Kleinert et al reported that some teachers were concerned about -the amount of time required to complete alternate assessment [s];‖ a percentage of teachers sampled claimed that -completing portfolios for students with severe disabilities took time away from teaching‖ (p. 40). Daniels (1999) concurred, -a major drawback of portfolio assessment is the issue of teacher time. Teachers must restructure their time to…develop record-keeping systems that are time-efficient and meaning-ful‖ (p. 172).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternate forms of assessment and evaluation evolved as edueators expressed dissatisfaction with traditional assessment praetiees (Daniels, 1999). The advantages of alternate forms of assessment over traditional, commercial, norm-referenced, and standardized tests are that teachers obtain a more accurate or representative description of a student's strengths, weaknesses, and needs.…”
Section: Development and Use O F Curriculum-based Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In response to the negative attitudes towards standardized testing, educators have developed alternative methods of evaluation (Daniels, 1999). These alternate assessments include Curriculum-Based Assessment (CBA) and CBM.…”
Section: Curriculum-based Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%