The Assembly State between Magnetic Nanosensors and Their Targets Orchestrates Their Magnetic Relaxation Response

Abstract

The target-induced clustering of magnetic nanoparticles is typically used for the identification of clinically relevant targets and events. A decrease in the water proton transverse NMR relaxation time, or T2, is observed upon clustering, allowing the sensitive and accurate detection of target molecules. We have discovered a new mechanistically unique nanoparticle-target interaction resulting in T2 increase, and demonstrate herein that this increase, and its associated r2 relaxivity decrease, is also observed upon the interaction of the nanoparticles with ligands or molecular entities. Small molecules, proteins, and a 15-bp nucleic acid sequence were chemically conjugated to polyacrylic-acid-coated iron oxide nanoparticles, and all decreased the original nanoparticle r2 value. Further experiments established that the r2 decrease was inversely proportional to the number of ligands bound to the nanoparticle and the molecular weight of the bound ligand. Additional experiments revealed that the T2-increasing mechanism was kinetically faster than the conventional clustering mechanism. Most importantly, under conditions that result in T2 increases, as little as 5.3 fmol of Bacillus anthracis plasmid DNA (pX01 and pX02), 8 pmol of the cholera toxin B subunit (Ctb), and even a few cancer cells in blood were detected. Transition from the binding to the clustering mechanism was observed in the carbohydrate-, Ctb-and DNA-sensing systems, simply by increasing the target concentration significantly above the nanoparticle concentration, or using Ctb in its pentameric form as opposed to its monomer. Collectively, these results demonstrate that the molecular architectures resulting from the interaction between magnetic nanosensors and their targets directly govern water proton NMR signal relaxation. We attribute the observed T2 increases to the bound target molecules partially obstructing the diffusion of solvent water molecules through the iron oxide nanoparticles' outer relaxation spheres of the superparamagnetic nanoparticles. Finally, we anticipate that this novel interaction can be incorporated into new clinical and field detection applications, due to its faster kinetics relative to the conventional nanoparticle-clustering assays.

Development of Multifunctional Hyaluronan-Coated Nanoparticles for Imaging and Drug Delivery to Cancer Cells

“…It is likely due to the difference in surface coating thickness and the degree of NP aggregation. 38,39 …”

Identification of Toxin Inhibitors Using a Magnetic Nanosensor‐Based Assay

“…Synthesis of bMR Nanosensors : The bMR nanosensors used in these studies are composed of polyacrylic acid coated iron oxide nanoparticles that has been conjugated with the various small molecule drugs following previously described reports. [ 3,6,33 ] Briefl y, polyacrylic acid coated iron oxide nanoparticles (PAA-IONPs, 75 nm, R 2 : 230 mM −1 s −1 ) were derivatized with a propargyl group by incubating the nanoparticles (50 mg Fe) in MES buffer (30 mL, pH = 6.5) with a solution of EDC (115.2 mg, 0.6 mmol) and NHS (69 mg, 0.6 mmol) in MES buffer (2.5 mL). To the resulting reaction mixture, propargylamine (33 mg, 0.6 mmol) in DMSO (0.75 mL) was added drop-wise under medium stirring and incubated for 6 h at room temperature.…”

“…The enhanced inhibitory properties of the sulindac-bMR and fusaric acid bMR nanosensors is not surprising, as it is well documented that the multiple display of low affi nity ligands on polymers and nanoparticles results in a multivalent system with enhanced binding and inhibitory properties. [ 3,33,34 ] Results are summarized in Table 1 .…”

Orthogonal biofunctionalization of magnetic nanoparticles via “clickable” poly(ethylene glycol) silanes: a “universal ligand” strategy to design stealth and target-specific nanocarriers

“…Cell uptake studies were performed in folate receptor (FR) positive human non-small cell lung adenocarcinoma (A549) lung cancer cells [27][28][29][30][31][32][33] and normal Neuro 2A cells, deprived of FR.…”