2009
DOI: 10.3997/2214-4609.20145919
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Asmari Formation Revisited: Changed Stratigraphic Allocation and New Biozonation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
87
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
87
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Assemblage (Wynd, 1965;Adams and Bourgeois, 1967;Laursen et al, 2009;Van Buchem et al, 2010) and comparisons with the global Oligocene/Miocene zonation of Cahuzac and Poignant (1997) (Tables 1, 2 and 3).…”
Section: N0mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Assemblage (Wynd, 1965;Adams and Bourgeois, 1967;Laursen et al, 2009;Van Buchem et al, 2010) and comparisons with the global Oligocene/Miocene zonation of Cahuzac and Poignant (1997) (Tables 1, 2 and 3).…”
Section: N0mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This biozonation is used by many recent authors (e.g., Allahkarampour Dill et al, 2010;Van Buchem et al, 2010;Sooltanian et al, 2011;Rahmani et al, 2012). The biozonation scheme of Laursen et al (2009) and Van Buchem et al (2010) have some basic differences compared to the old scheme (Adams and Bourgeois, 1967). In the old scheme, the noticeable thickness of the Asmari limestone, containing Archaias, has been considered Aquitanian.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations