2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2015.01.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The ascending aortic aneurysm: When to intervene?

Abstract: BackgroundThoracic ascending aorta aneurysms (TAA) are an important cause of mortality in adults but are a relatively less studied subject compared to abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). The purpose of this review is to explain the main aspects (etiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis) of this disease and to summarize the most recent developments in its management.MethodologyLiterature was obtained through online health related search engines (PubMed, MEDLINE) by including the following keywords: ascending aorta an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
47
1
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
1
47
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Aortic size: aortic diameter did not significantly correlate with mechanical and morphological tissue properties in this study, agreeing with recently published results (7,18). Current guidelines recommend surgical intervention at an aortic diameter greater than 5.5 cm, 5.0 cm for MFS patients (26,27); similarly, Pape et al show that type A dissections occur at a mean diameter of 5.31 cm, below the 5.5 cm cutoff (28). Additionally, Coady et al (29) and Davies et al (30) even show an increased risk of complications at aortic sizes smaller than 4 cm for descending TAAs, well under the 5.5 cm cutoff, also supported by the similar mean 5-year survival rates for patients with 4.0-5.9 cm aortic diameters (31).…”
Section: Agingsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Aortic size: aortic diameter did not significantly correlate with mechanical and morphological tissue properties in this study, agreeing with recently published results (7,18). Current guidelines recommend surgical intervention at an aortic diameter greater than 5.5 cm, 5.0 cm for MFS patients (26,27); similarly, Pape et al show that type A dissections occur at a mean diameter of 5.31 cm, below the 5.5 cm cutoff (28). Additionally, Coady et al (29) and Davies et al (30) even show an increased risk of complications at aortic sizes smaller than 4 cm for descending TAAs, well under the 5.5 cm cutoff, also supported by the similar mean 5-year survival rates for patients with 4.0-5.9 cm aortic diameters (31).…”
Section: Agingsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…It is unethical to harvest human aortic tissue samples at earlier stages of the disease, so the progressive changes in mechanical properties are unknown. Consequently, the assessment for prophylactic surgical intervention with an aortic graft relies on the patient’s aortic diameter, 44 which provides a rule of thumb at best. Our time-resolved, layer-specific mechanical properties of the MFS mouse aorta help provide input variables, such as intimal and medial mechanics, necessary for developing computational models of aortic dilation, aneurysm, and rupture.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…31, 44 However, such criteria are not always sufficient to evaluate the risk of dissection. Finite element analysis (FEA) has been implemented to evaluate wall stress and assess aortic aneurysm rupture risk.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The length of pulse wave propagation L is the length from the heart to the aortic arch. In this study, L is defined 5cm, which is the length of the ascending aorta [10] because we are not able to measure that length noninvasively for each person.…”
Section: Proposed Measurement Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%