2008
DOI: 10.1057/sth.2007.11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Art of Governing Smoking: Discourse Analysis of Australian Anti-Smoking Campaigns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Discursive analytical methods are increasing within tobacco control (Gilbert, 2008;Lamerichs et al, 2009;Thompson et al, 2007;Triandafilidis et al, 2017). Many studies utilising this approach seek to describe localised narratives or identify discursive strategies and effects, framing spoken texts as relatively atomised (Lamerichs et al, 2009).…”
Section: Critical Discourse Analysis (Cda)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Discursive analytical methods are increasing within tobacco control (Gilbert, 2008;Lamerichs et al, 2009;Thompson et al, 2007;Triandafilidis et al, 2017). Many studies utilising this approach seek to describe localised narratives or identify discursive strategies and effects, framing spoken texts as relatively atomised (Lamerichs et al, 2009).…”
Section: Critical Discourse Analysis (Cda)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For many years the tobacco industry has been interested in women as consumers (Mackay and Amos 2003). Additionally, typical anti-smoking campaigns are being found to be less effective among women smokers than among men (Amos et al 2011;Gilbert 2008;Jonsdottir 2013;World Health Organization 2010).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This particular function of humor seems especially likely to arise in health policy research, given that political frames are, arguably, more likely to be denaturalized via parodic engagement than their medical counterparts. Medical discourses are routinely reified via appeals to science (Gilbert, 2008), whereas political narratives are often publicly debated. Indeed, in asking jurors to critically engage with policy solutions, we invited them to reject, disrupt, and trouble them.…”
Section: Negotiating Power: Participant Use Of Humormentioning
confidence: 99%