2017
DOI: 10.1057/jird.2016.7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The art of constructing (in)security: probing rhetorical strategies of securitisation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, who promulgates and who listens to specific articulations shapes the possibilities for successful legitimation, as some speakers might be especially authoritative (or weak) vis-à-vis particular audiences (Goddard and Krebs 2015 , pp. 27–28; Jackson 2006 , p. 28; Smith 2021 , p. 4; Senn 2017 , p. 610; Krebs and Jackson 2007 , p. 47; see also Bourdieu and Wacquant 1992 , pp. 118–119).…”
Section: Rhetoric and Public Legitimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, who promulgates and who listens to specific articulations shapes the possibilities for successful legitimation, as some speakers might be especially authoritative (or weak) vis-à-vis particular audiences (Goddard and Krebs 2015 , pp. 27–28; Jackson 2006 , p. 28; Smith 2021 , p. 4; Senn 2017 , p. 610; Krebs and Jackson 2007 , p. 47; see also Bourdieu and Wacquant 1992 , pp. 118–119).…”
Section: Rhetoric and Public Legitimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From this perspective, writers suggested various definitions for rhetoric, such as the art of persuasion, the affective and motivating aspects of speech intertwined with its logical and factual aspects (Martin, 2016), the ways of effectively using spoken or written language to inform and persuade others (Bizzell & Herzberg, 2001), and ways of intensely conveying narrators’ experiences (Skelton, 2006). Senn (2017) also suggested that people use rhetorical devices to persuade others of their natural authority and fidelity to historical facts or conventional beliefs and that the issues spoken about are profoundly meaningful for the listeners’ interests.…”
Section: Rhetorical Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this variable we coded all references to feelings and categorised all units into unemotional, somewhat emotional and inflammatory. 11 Our starting point was that high emotionality in general facilitates securitisation process (Senn 2016). Consequently, we assumed that the level of emotionality in the media discourse about the Pride Parade corresponded positively with a persuasive force that securitising moves had on their target audiences.…”
Section: Content Analysis Of Media Coveragementioning
confidence: 99%