2016
DOI: 10.5296/ije.v8i2.9117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Art of Cheating in the 21st Millennium: Innovative Mechanisms and Insidious Ploys in Academic Deceit

Abstract: Cheating is rampant throughout academia, with no hard evidence suggesting that such pedagogic deceit will wane. Cheating is most insidious on the college level, where such academic deceit has evolved from perhaps its basic pattern of merely peeking at another student's examination, to planned deceit employing sophisticated subterfuges and interplay between two or more co-conspirators. Importantly, cheating per se may not necessarily be student initiated, but fostered by college/university staff for purposes of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These escalation patterns can be iterative and may not have an apparent conclusion (Oravec, 2015(Oravec, , 2022. Cheating and its detection can be considered as an arms race in which particular technological advances for detectors are often matched with advances by those who are under surveillance (Lipson & Karthikeyan, 2016). The crowdsourcings of subjects' reflections about some of the cheating-deception systems in place are already being used by students and employees to alter their behavior in various testing and evaluation contexts (as described in Rozario, 2020).…”
Section: Resistance To Cheating Detection Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These escalation patterns can be iterative and may not have an apparent conclusion (Oravec, 2015(Oravec, , 2022. Cheating and its detection can be considered as an arms race in which particular technological advances for detectors are often matched with advances by those who are under surveillance (Lipson & Karthikeyan, 2016). The crowdsourcings of subjects' reflections about some of the cheating-deception systems in place are already being used by students and employees to alter their behavior in various testing and evaluation contexts (as described in Rozario, 2020).…”
Section: Resistance To Cheating Detection Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A failure to acknowledge sources of citation properly cause plagiarisms, which can occur both intentionally and unintentionally, which less discouraged in developing countries (Balasubramanian, Bennett, & Pierce, 2017;Kauffman & Young, 2015). Particularly, academic plagiarism occurs extensively when the efforts to monitor a candidate reduced and opportunities to cheat increased (Etter, Cramer, & Finn, 2006;Lipson & Karthikeyan, 2016;Lucifora & Tonello, 2015;Onwuegbuzie, 2017). Hence, the lenience to stick strongly to APA style among the journal reviewers and editors can definitely cause the high level of plagiarism and improper use of APA style.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%