2004
DOI: 10.1002/pbc.20146
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The art and science of writing manuscripts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Arceci 2004) not just simply describing what was done, and backed up with appropriate rationale (i.e. with references) for the choice of methods; and • writing for a particular audience (e.g.…”
Section: Reflections On Impact Assessment Research Writingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arceci 2004) not just simply describing what was done, and backed up with appropriate rationale (i.e. with references) for the choice of methods; and • writing for a particular audience (e.g.…”
Section: Reflections On Impact Assessment Research Writingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Robert J. Arceci, editor-in-chief of Pediatric Blood and Cancer, emphatically counsels against the use of declarative titles, especially those that make a strong statement. In a 2004 editorial he wrote "Strong declarative statements may help to sell newspapers, but they tend to overemphasize or inflate conclusions and are usually not appropriate for scientific publications" (Arceci, 2004).…”
Section: The Titlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Publishing your work is a necessary part of achieving success in an academic and research career. Moreover, as Arceci wisely observes, it is our obligation to our patients, our discipline, our colleagues, our sponsors and yes, ourselves [1]. The ability to articulate your ideas and contribute to the body of knowledge in your discipline is an essential skill and, happily, one that can be cultivated and refined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%