2006
DOI: 10.1121/1.2139074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The array invariant

Abstract: A method is derived for instantaneous source-range estimation in a horizontally stratified ocean waveguide from passive beam-time intensity data obtained after conventional plane-wave beamforming of acoustic array measurements. The method has advantages over existing source localization methods, such as matched field processing or the waveguide invariant. First, no knowledge of the environment is required except that the received field should not be dominated by purely waterborne propagation. Second, range can… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
64
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The humpback non-song vocalizations, dominated by shorter duration D-and B-moans, as well as a small fraction of longer duration cries, are found to have significantly larger mean and more variable inter-pulse intervals of 14.2 ± 11 s. The non-song vocalizations were detected at night with negligible detections during the day, implying they probably function as nighttime communication or contact signals. The humpback song and non-song vocalizations are separately localized using the moving array triangulation [2,9,10] and array invariant techniques [2,[9][10][11]. The humpback song and non-song moan calls are found to be consistently localized to a dense area on northeastern Georges Bank and a less dense region extended from Franklin Basin to the Great South Channel.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The humpback non-song vocalizations, dominated by shorter duration D-and B-moans, as well as a small fraction of longer duration cries, are found to have significantly larger mean and more variable inter-pulse intervals of 14.2 ± 11 s. The non-song vocalizations were detected at night with negligible detections during the day, implying they probably function as nighttime communication or contact signals. The humpback song and non-song vocalizations are separately localized using the moving array triangulation [2,9,10] and array invariant techniques [2,[9][10][11]. The humpback song and non-song moan calls are found to be consistently localized to a dense area on northeastern Georges Bank and a less dense region extended from Franklin Basin to the Great South Channel.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The horizontal location of each marine mammal vocalization consists of range and bearing estimates. The moving array triangulation (MAT) [2,9,10] and the array invariant (AI) [2,[9][10][11] methods are applied to determine the range of the vocalizations from the horizontal receiver array centre. Position estimation error, or the root mean squared (RMS) distance between the actual and estimated location, is a combination of range and bearing errors quantified for this array in [2,[9][10][11].…”
Section: Localization and Call Rate Spatial Distributions Of Humpbackmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The source level of each baleen whale vocalization is estimated from the received vocalization pressure level by compensating for corresponding broadband transmission loss [1,[16][17][18] from whale location to the receiver array center location [19][20][21] in the temporally-and spatially-varying Gulf of Maine environment. The whale locations for each species were previously determined using the moving array triangulation [2,22,23], the bearings-migration minimum mean square error and the array invariant techniques [2,[22][23][24] from the measured bearing versus time trajectories of sequences of vocalizations from that species [1]. The marine mammal species-dependent vocalization source level is an important parameter for estimating the marine mammal detection region for a given species in any passive underwater acoustic sensing system [1,2,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%