2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2021.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The area method for measuring acetabular cup anteversion: An accurate and autonomous solution

Abstract: Several radiological methods of measuring anteversion of the acetabular component after total hip arthroplasty have been described, all time-consuming and with varying reproducibility. This study aimed to compare the recently proposed Area method to true cup anteversion as determined by an accelerometer. This study further applied this method programmatically to autonomously determine radiographic cup orientation using two computer programs, then compared these results to hand and accelerometer measurements. 1… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is one of the most successful orthopedic procedures. Survival rates between 90% at 10 years and 93% at 20 years have been reported in different studies [ 1 , 2 ]. Differences in implant and patient characteristics can undoubtedly explain some of this variability observed in prosthesis durability, but the effect of surgical technique and implant orientation cannot be ignored [ 1 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is one of the most successful orthopedic procedures. Survival rates between 90% at 10 years and 93% at 20 years have been reported in different studies [ 1 , 2 ]. Differences in implant and patient characteristics can undoubtedly explain some of this variability observed in prosthesis durability, but the effect of surgical technique and implant orientation cannot be ignored [ 1 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differences in implant and patient characteristics can undoubtedly explain some of this variability observed in prosthesis durability, but the effect of surgical technique and implant orientation cannot be ignored [ 1 ]. Acetabular component orientation has been shown to affect the range of motion (ROM), dislocation, wear, and implant survival, but even experienced surgeons can make errors of ±15° [ 2 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%