2021
DOI: 10.1063/5.0042573
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The area localized coupled model for analytical mean flow prediction in arbitrary wind farm geometries

Abstract: This work introduces the area localized coupled (ALC) model, which extends the applicability of approaches that couple classical wake superposition models and atmospheric boundary layer models to wind farms with arbitrary layouts. Coupling wake and top–down boundary layer models is particularly challenging since the latter requires averaging over planform areas associated with turbine-specific regions of the flow that need to be specified. The ALC model uses Voronoi tessellation to define this local area aroun… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach agrees well with large eddy simulations (LES) and field observations and has been extended to general wind farm layouts (Starke et al. 2021).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This approach agrees well with large eddy simulations (LES) and field observations and has been extended to general wind farm layouts (Starke et al. 2021).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The coupled wake boundary layer (CWBL) model (Stevens, Gayme & Meneveau 2016) widens the applicability of coupled models by introducing a two-way coupling between a wake model and a top-down model. This approach agrees well with large eddy simulations (LES) and field observations and has been extended to general wind farm layouts (Starke et al 2021).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The parameter c ft (also a function of position) can be evaluated by averaging the wind farm thrust coefficient per unit area c ft upwind with respect to location x and along a streamline through the point of interest, assumed in the present study to be rectilinear. Following Starke et al (2021), we argue that such an averaging procedure better represents the fact that the IBL height at any x depends on the thrust coefficient per unit area experienced up to that point rather than on its local value. In order to perform the averaging operation, c ft is defined at every cell of a two-dimensional Cartesian sampling grid as…”
Section: Wind Farm Parametrizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To capture this two-way interaction, it has been proposed to couple wake and top-down models; for example, by adjusting parameters in both models to match the hub-height-averaged velocities (Stevens, Gayme & Meneveau 2016 b ; Starke et al. 2021). Examples of two-way coupling can also be found in existing engineering software, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%