2006
DOI: 10.2143/ia.41.0.2004759
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Archaeometallurgy of War Kabud, Western Iran

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The variability of tin content is commonplace in the study of the Iron Age bronze objects of Iran, especially in Luristan bronzes. Results of analysis of different bronze objects from Luristan show that there was no specified procedure to control the alloy composition in the manufactured bronzes in that time [8,10,12]. Nevertheless, each of the processes may have been used for the bronze production in these Iron Age bronze artefacts.…”
Section: Alloy Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The variability of tin content is commonplace in the study of the Iron Age bronze objects of Iran, especially in Luristan bronzes. Results of analysis of different bronze objects from Luristan show that there was no specified procedure to control the alloy composition in the manufactured bronzes in that time [8,10,12]. Nevertheless, each of the processes may have been used for the bronze production in these Iron Age bronze artefacts.…”
Section: Alloy Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the large scale of bronze objects related to Luristan, there exist a limited number of investigations about technology and metallurgy of bronze objects from this region [8][9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In fact, the composition of inclusions suggests they are residues of sulfidic ores (Singh & Chattopadhyay, 2003;Bachmann, 1982). Sulfidic inclusions have been observed in many copper alloy artefacts from other examined sites in prehistoric Iran such as Luristan Iron Age sites (Fleming et al, 2006;Fleming et al, 2005) and some Chalcolithic and Bronze Age sites in southeastern Iran (Thornton & Lamberg-Karlovsky, 2004). To identify microstructure in detail and to make clear the manufacturing method of the artefacts, three mounted samples from each site were etched in ferric chloride solution and examined under metallographic (optical) microscope (Caron et al, 2004;Scott, 1991).…”
Section: Cumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the field of archaeometallurgical studies, there are many reports and papers about study of ancient ore mining, slags and other metallurgical remains, artefacts and so on between various archaeological investigations about Iran; such as works on Tappeh Yahya (Tepe Yahya) in southeast Iran (Heskel & Lamberg-Karlovsky, 1980;Heskel & Lamberg-Karlovsky 1986;Thornton & Ehler, 2003;Thornton & Lamberg-Karlovsky, 2004); Tappeh Hisar (Tepe Hissar), Northern Iran (Thornton 2009b); Godin Tappeh (Godin Tepe) (Frame, 2007) and Tel-i Iblis (Frame, 2004); Luristan Bronzes (e.g., Oudbashi et al, in Press;Fleming et al, 2005;Fleming et al, 2006;Moorey, 1964Moorey, , 1969Birmingham et al, 1964); Haft Tappeh (Haft Tepe), southwest Iran (Oudbashi et al, 2009); and ancient slags from Meymand, Kerman, southeast Iran (Emami & Oudbashi, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%