1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-4181(97)00016-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The archaeology of the Crusader Kingdom of Jerusalem: a review of work 1947-97

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The scholarly debate started already in the 16th and 17th centuries with the publications by both Greek and Franciscan authors who basically dealt with the origins of the site, its holy mementoes in their devotional and commemorative significance, and the properties and rights granted to each Christian community. From the 19th century onwards, the basilica has been investigated from the viewpoint of historical-religious topography [4,5], architectural history [6][7][8], structural analysis [9,10] and archaeology [11][12][13], and art history and iconography [14][15][16][17][18][19]. Whereas the early history of the building has been much discussed since the very beginnings, its developments in the Byzantine and Crusader periods have been more specifically investigated only in much more recent works.…”
Section: Bethlehem As Historical Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The scholarly debate started already in the 16th and 17th centuries with the publications by both Greek and Franciscan authors who basically dealt with the origins of the site, its holy mementoes in their devotional and commemorative significance, and the properties and rights granted to each Christian community. From the 19th century onwards, the basilica has been investigated from the viewpoint of historical-religious topography [4,5], architectural history [6][7][8], structural analysis [9,10] and archaeology [11][12][13], and art history and iconography [14][15][16][17][18][19]. Whereas the early history of the building has been much discussed since the very beginnings, its developments in the Byzantine and Crusader periods have been more specifically investigated only in much more recent works.…”
Section: Bethlehem As Historical Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kühnel [71] and Pringle [8], on the other hand, were inclined towards an alternative view of the Constantinian church. They proposed that this would have consisted of a colonnaded atrium and a longitudinal body with a central nave and four flanking aisles, one bay shorter on the west than the present church.…”
Section: Archaeological Excavations At the Church Of The Nativity-s mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations