2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2443.2006.00925.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The archaeal Hjm helicase has recQ‐like functions, and may be involved in repair of stalled replication fork

Abstract: The archaeal Hjm is a structure-specific DNA helicase, which was originally identified in the hyperthermophilic archaeon, Pyrococcus furiosus , by in vitro screening for Holliday junction migration activity. Further biochemical analyses of the Hjm protein from P. furiosus showed that this protein preferably binds to fork-related Y-structured DNAs and unwinds their double-stranded regions in vitro , just like the E. coli RecQ protein. Furthermore, genetic analyses showed that Hjm produced in E. coli cells parti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
44
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
5
44
1
Order By: Relevance
“…3B and C), perhaps due to the fact that the leading nascent strand of the replication fork resembles a 5Ј overhang structure, while the lagging nascent strand of the replication fork resembles a 3Ј overhang structure. This unwinding activity of StoHjm differs from those reported for Hjm from P. furiosus and for Hel308a from M. thermautotrophicus (9,11), as these enzymes unwind only the lagging strand of the replication fork and the 3Ј overhang structure. The difference in unwinding activity between StoHjm and Hjm/Hel308a may be due to evolutional divergence between Euryarchaeota and Crenarchaeota and may indicate divergent cellular functions of Hjm/Hel308a helicases in these two major archaeal subdomains.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 50%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…3B and C), perhaps due to the fact that the leading nascent strand of the replication fork resembles a 5Ј overhang structure, while the lagging nascent strand of the replication fork resembles a 3Ј overhang structure. This unwinding activity of StoHjm differs from those reported for Hjm from P. furiosus and for Hel308a from M. thermautotrophicus (9,11), as these enzymes unwind only the lagging strand of the replication fork and the 3Ј overhang structure. The difference in unwinding activity between StoHjm and Hjm/Hel308a may be due to evolutional divergence between Euryarchaeota and Crenarchaeota and may indicate divergent cellular functions of Hjm/Hel308a helicases in these two major archaeal subdomains.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 50%
“…These results indicate that StoHjm preferentially binds to ssDNA, overhang structures, and branched DNA but not blunt-ended DNA. The DNA binding properties of StoHjm are similar to those of Hjm from P. furiosus and Hel308a from M. thermautotrophicus (9,11). StoHjm preferentially unwinds nascent strands of the replication fork.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition to the Δhef mutant, the sensitivity of Δhjm to MMC is obviously higher than that of the other three deletion mutants, and therefore, the Hjm helicase probably functions in the repair of stalled replication forks, especially those caused by ICLs. The substrate specificity of the P. furiosus Hjm helicase in vitro is consistent with this prediction (Fujikane et al, 2006). It would be interesting to determine how Hef (especially its helicase activity) and Hjm function together in stalled replication fork repair in the cells.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…A biochemical screen to detect an activity that can promote the migration of synthetic Holliday junctions identified the Hjm/Hel308a helicase (Fujikane et al, 2005). This archaeal protein partially complemented the defect of RecQ functions in a recQ mutant Escherichia coli cells, and may be involved in stalled replication fork stabilization like eukaryotic RecQ family proteins including WRN, BLM, and Sgs1 (Fujikane et al, 2006;Guy and Bolt, 2005). In vitro biochemical and structural analyses of these proteins in Archaea have been performed, and their in vitro activities have been characterized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%