1996
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0471.1996.tb00084.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Aramaic pantheon of Taymā'

Abstract: This article discusses the origin of three Semitic deities which are attested in the Aramaic inscriptions in the North Arabian city of Tayma'. These are Salm, Sangila and Ašīmā. Together they comprise the pantheon of Taymā'. The etymology, identity and the attestation of these deities in Aramaic and other sources are investigated. After studying these three deities within their Semitic background, this paper suggests that these deities, which had been adopted by Arabs in Taymā', are of Aramaic origin and were … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although some scholars have suggested an Arabian origin of the worship of Qos, there is no epigraphic evidence of his cult in the northern Hejaz in this period. The scarce data, the majority coming from Tayma, points instead to the worship of Aramaic gods such as Salm, Sangila and Asima, introduced probably as early as the eight century BCE (Maraqten 1996). Two large temples were likely associated with the worship of these deities, although they are of post-Babylonian period date (Hausleiter 2012, 304-14).…”
Section: Late Contact Period: From the Late Eighth To The Mid-sixth Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although some scholars have suggested an Arabian origin of the worship of Qos, there is no epigraphic evidence of his cult in the northern Hejaz in this period. The scarce data, the majority coming from Tayma, points instead to the worship of Aramaic gods such as Salm, Sangila and Asima, introduced probably as early as the eight century BCE (Maraqten 1996). Two large temples were likely associated with the worship of these deities, although they are of post-Babylonian period date (Hausleiter 2012, 304-14).…”
Section: Late Contact Period: From the Late Eighth To The Mid-sixth Cmentioning
confidence: 99%