2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20993.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Aquila comparison project: the effects of feedback and numerical methods on simulations of galaxy formation

Abstract: We compare the results of various cosmological gas-dynamical codes used to simulate the formation of a galaxy in the Λ cold dark matter structure formation paradigm. The various runs (13 in total) differ in their numerical hydrodynamical treatment [smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH), moving mesh and adaptive mesh refinement] but share the same initial conditions and adopt in each case their latest published model of gas cooling, star formation and feedback. Despite the common halo assembly history, we find … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

28
533
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 448 publications
(563 citation statements)
references
References 134 publications
28
533
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, throughout this paper κrot will represent a whole class of kinematic morphological parameters, most of which are based on the distribution of the 'orbital circularity' parameter . This parameter is usually defined as = jz/j(E), where j(E) is the maximum specific angular momentum possible for a star with specific binding energy E (Abadi et al 2003), or as V = jz/rvc(r), where vc(r) = GM (< r)/r is the circular velocity at the distance r (Scannapieco et al 2009(Scannapieco et al , 2012. Some examples of such circularity-based morphological parameters include the discto-total ratio, defined as the fraction of stars with sufficiently circular orbits, typically D/T = f ( > 0.7) ≈ f ( V > 0.8) (Aumer et al 2013;Marinacci, Pakmor & Springel 2014), or the bulge-tototal fraction, usually defined as B/T = 2 × f ( < 0) (but see Martig et al 2012;Zavala et al 2016, for an improved B/T measurement).…”
Section: The Amount Of Rotational Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, throughout this paper κrot will represent a whole class of kinematic morphological parameters, most of which are based on the distribution of the 'orbital circularity' parameter . This parameter is usually defined as = jz/j(E), where j(E) is the maximum specific angular momentum possible for a star with specific binding energy E (Abadi et al 2003), or as V = jz/rvc(r), where vc(r) = GM (< r)/r is the circular velocity at the distance r (Scannapieco et al 2009(Scannapieco et al , 2012. Some examples of such circularity-based morphological parameters include the discto-total ratio, defined as the fraction of stars with sufficiently circular orbits, typically D/T = f ( > 0.7) ≈ f ( V > 0.8) (Aumer et al 2013;Marinacci, Pakmor & Springel 2014), or the bulge-tototal fraction, usually defined as B/T = 2 × f ( < 0) (but see Martig et al 2012;Zavala et al 2016, for an improved B/T measurement).…”
Section: The Amount Of Rotational Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, they properly trace the cosmological streams that feed galaxies at high redshift, including mergers and smooth flows, and they resolve the violent disc instability that governs the high-z disc evolution and plays an important role in bulge formation Mandelker et al 2014). The AMR code is superior to the common SPH codes for properly tracing some of the high-resolution hydrodynamical processes involved (e.g., Agertz et al 2007;Scannapieco et al 2012;Bauer & Springel 2012), and it seems to be comparable in its performance to new codes using a moving unstructured grid (Bauer & Springel 2012). However, like other simulations, the current simulations are not yet doing the most accurate possible job in treating the star formation and feedback processes.…”
Section: Simulations With Different Feedback Strengthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of code comparison projects have been performed, and are currently underway (e.g. Scannapieco et al, 2012;Kim et al, 2014).…”
Section: Cosmological Hydrodynamic Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%