Proceedings of the 13th Conference on Computational Linguistics - 1990
DOI: 10.3115/997939.998003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The applicaton of two-level morphology to non-concatenative German morphology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Other modules implemented using the core formalism include two morphology engines [33], reversible-grammar text generation [31,22], and the surface speech act recognition described in Section Two.…”
Section: Uniform Core Formalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other modules implemented using the core formalism include two morphology engines [33], reversible-grammar text generation [31,22], and the surface speech act recognition described in Section Two.…”
Section: Uniform Core Formalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two different morphological components incorporating these ideas have been implemented. A first implementation (Trost, 1990) was based on Bear (l988a, 1988b). A short overview of this implementation that follows will give us an opportunity to look at the problems of using rule filters in more detail.…”
Section: System Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cf. Trost [48] . A tillrd possibility would be to simply anticipate the effects of morphophonemics in the specification of paradigms (even if this results in the multiplication of paradigms).…”
Section: Inflectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two-level approach to inflection may be found in Koskenniemi [32] (for an interesting extension in the direction of feature-based processing, cf. Trost [48]) . This differs from the current proposal in being morpheme-based .…”
Section: Approaches To Inflectionmentioning
confidence: 99%