2013
DOI: 10.1155/2013/326473
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Application of the Homotopy Analysis Method and the Homotopy Perturbation Method to the Davey-Stewartson Equations and Comparison between Them and Exact Solutions

Abstract: We introduce two powerful methods to solve the Davey-Stewartson equations: one is the homotopy perturbation method (HPM) and the other is the homotopy analysis method (HAM). HAM is a strong and easy to use analytic tool for nonlinear problems. Comparison of the HPM results with the HAM results, and compute the absolute errors between the exact solutions of the DS equations with the HPM solutions and HAM solutions are obtained.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the context, q(x, y, t) is the amplitude of a surface wave packet, while φ(x, y) represents the velocity potential of the mean flow interacting with the surface wave [10]. Although the classical Davey-Stewartson equation had been studied many times, the studies for fractional Davey-Stewartson equation was started newly [11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context, q(x, y, t) is the amplitude of a surface wave packet, while φ(x, y) represents the velocity potential of the mean flow interacting with the surface wave [10]. Although the classical Davey-Stewartson equation had been studied many times, the studies for fractional Davey-Stewartson equation was started newly [11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%