2003
DOI: 10.1159/000076280
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The application of region-specific probes for the resolution of duplication 8p: a case report and a review of the literature

Abstract: The structural rearrangement in the short arm of a chromosome 8 in a clinically affected patient has been reinvestigated by FISH using whole chromosome painting and region specific YAC probes. An inverted duplication of the segment p22→p11.2 and a deletion of the subtelomeric region were demonstrated. By this approach, a more detailed resolution of the duplication/deletion 8p was possible. With the application of molecular cytogenetic methods the existence of different duplication segments within the clinical … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the Utype exchange (mechanism 3) is the most frequent inv dup del mechanism in all other chromosome arms [Rowe et al, 2009], the majority of reported inv dup del(8p) can be explained by the mechanisms 1 or 2 mentioned above ( fig. 4 ; table 3 ) [Weleber et al, 1976;Dill et al, 1987;Minelli et al, 1993;Barber et al, 1994;de Die-Smulders et al, 1995;Guo et al, 1995;Floridia et al, 1996;Macmillin et al, 2000;Giglio et al, 2001;Pabst et al, 2003;Felbor et al, 2004;Shimokawa et al, 2004Shimokawa et al, , 2005Cooke et al, 2008;Zuffardi et al, 2009] with few exceptions [Buysse et al, 2009;Rowe et al, 2009]. In this study, the formation of the inv dup del(8p) appears to be caused by mechanism 2 in patient 2, and by mechanism 3 in patient 3 ( fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…Although the Utype exchange (mechanism 3) is the most frequent inv dup del mechanism in all other chromosome arms [Rowe et al, 2009], the majority of reported inv dup del(8p) can be explained by the mechanisms 1 or 2 mentioned above ( fig. 4 ; table 3 ) [Weleber et al, 1976;Dill et al, 1987;Minelli et al, 1993;Barber et al, 1994;de Die-Smulders et al, 1995;Guo et al, 1995;Floridia et al, 1996;Macmillin et al, 2000;Giglio et al, 2001;Pabst et al, 2003;Felbor et al, 2004;Shimokawa et al, 2004Shimokawa et al, , 2005Cooke et al, 2008;Zuffardi et al, 2009] with few exceptions [Buysse et al, 2009;Rowe et al, 2009]. In this study, the formation of the inv dup del(8p) appears to be caused by mechanism 2 in patient 2, and by mechanism 3 in patient 3 ( fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…We report on an inverted duplication of region 8p12→23.3 presenting with significant motor development delay, hypotonia, facial dysmorphisms, ventricular septal defects and corpus callosum agenesis, most of which were reported in previous studies [ 4 - 7 , 11 ]. The regions 8p21 and 8p22 were commonly duplicated in all patients with inv dup (8p).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…To date, a number of patients with inverted duplication of 8p have been identified through cytogenetic analysis [ 1 - 7 ] and different breakpoints related to 8p have been reported [ 4 ]. The distal breakpoint was predominantly in 8p23 and was found in combination with various proximal breakpoints (centromere, p11 and p12), but predominantly within 8p11.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This latter patient carried the smallest duplication (4.9 Mb) of our series. Patients 16,17,18,19,and 20 were from the same family and included two sibs and their children (Figure 1). All five individuals presented with mild to moderate ID without any major associated malformation.…”
Section: Neurodevelopmental Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%