The application of multi-attribute utility theory for a market share-based design evaluation

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to use the concepts of the multi-attribute utility theory to develop a model to evaluate the design of low-density residential units to increase the profit of the company from a certain design, by assessing the changes in the market shares as a result of the built unit’s attributes.Design/methodology/approachThe proposed platform consists of two stages: Stage I or relational model development and Stage II or design evaluation. Stage I is concerned with developing a mathematical model that links design variables (e.g. the R-Value of the building envelope and construction material) with the assessment attributes (e.g. price and carbon emissions). Stage II ensures the fulfillment of the corporation’s goals in maximizing profit and market shares using multi-attribute utility theory.FindingsThe application of the proposed model on a case study – a single-family house – shows that reducing the selling price of the unit is not always the best marketing strategy builders should pursue to increase their sales and accordingly their profit, as accounting for other attributes (e.g. performance, operational cost and environmental impact) leads to larger changes in the market shares and accordingly in profit.Research limitations/implicationsThe limitations of this research are manifested in the following points: it does not account for the impact of the marketing campaigns on the market shares; it considers the profit as a percentage of the construction cost; and it has not been validated on high-density residential buildings.Practical implicationsThis research provides speculative builders with a platform that allows the objective evaluation of houses’ designs prior to introducing them to the market so builders can increase their market shares and consequently their profit. The proposed platform also contributes to increasing the sustainable performance of the housing industry, as it allows for the assessment of the design against economic, environmental and social attributes concurrently, which ensures a balanced consideration of the built houses on sustainability pillars.Social implicationsThe proposed platform for design evaluation extends the assessment attributes beyond the traditionally considered economic and environmental attributes. By doing so, it assists decision-makers in evaluating the potential social influence of the proposed design and, as a result, reduces the unwanted impact.Originality/valueThis research combines the concepts of multi-attribute utility with market studies to develop an objective decision support tool for evaluating the design of speculative houses to increase the sustainable performance of the builders without compromising on their profit.

Drivers of housing purchasing decisions: a data-driven analysis

“…Incorporating consumers' expectations and requirements early in the design phase of a product and service is a common practice in the manufacturing industry (Hoyle and Chen, 2007;Li and Wu, 2011;Nahm et al, 2013), where well-developed platforms link customers' requirements with product and service' features. The construction industry researchers have developed several frameworks, using different concepts such as the quality function deployment (Wood et al, 2016;Yang et al, 2003) and utility theory (BuHamdan et al, 2019), to link customers' requirements with the technical features of buildings. However, the question that always arises is: What features should we consider during the design to improve the desirability of a building?…”

“…There are two ways to determine such features; survey the opinions of potential customers, as in the work of BuHamdan et al (2019), or analyze the features of purchased domiciles to uncover buyer's preference. The present research follows the second path.…”

The Decision-Making in Planning of Housing on Musi Riverbank, Palembang

“…This study aims to make decisions for the housing planning on Musi River banks with a socio-ecological approach using a decision-making method that involves many experts. This study decision making uses the MAUT method which has a consistent basis of assessment that considers solutions for integrated problems and conflicting interests (BuHamdan, Alwisy, Bouferguene, & Al-Hussein, 2019). MAUT approach is based on utility theory devoted to assessment techniques and elicitation procedures (Alberti & Cavalcante, 2022).…”

The use of reinforced learning to support multidisciplinary design in the AEC industry: Assessing the utilization of Markov Decision Process

“…Many researchers have developed frameworks and tools that embrace the decision-making approach of engineering design. Examples can be seen in the several multi-criteria building systems design frameworks, [3][4][5] environmentally friendly concrete element design, 6,7 optimizing the environmental performance of buildings, 8 and in the value-driven design of the aeronautics industry. 1,[9][10][11][12] In these endeavours, the design deliverables' features are linked with their potential impacts on selected performance metrics and assessed according to that impact.…”