2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2020.105306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The application of Local Indicators for Categorical Data (LICD) to explore spatial dependence in archaeological spaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(50 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While spatial data are always correlated with each other according to Tobler's First Law of Geography [91][92][93], the Moran's index represents one of the first developments for reading these correlations [51]. Here, the simplicity of the implementation of this statistical tool, without setting up polygonal geometry, confirms the contribution of this type of approach even if other methods such as HLC (historic landscape characterization) [94,95] or LICD (local indicators for categorical data) could certainly complete and validate the established results [90].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While spatial data are always correlated with each other according to Tobler's First Law of Geography [91][92][93], the Moran's index represents one of the first developments for reading these correlations [51]. Here, the simplicity of the implementation of this statistical tool, without setting up polygonal geometry, confirms the contribution of this type of approach even if other methods such as HLC (historic landscape characterization) [94,95] or LICD (local indicators for categorical data) could certainly complete and validate the established results [90].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The correlations observed from Moran's index were low (between I = 0.18 and 0.08) and explained only a small proportion of the observations. Global and local of spatial autocorrelation analysis have been common in archaeology since the development of GIS, but is currently of limited use in anthropological studies [87][88][89][90]. While spatial data are always correlated with each other according to Tobler's First Law of Geography [91][92][93], the Moran's index represents one of the first developments for reading these correlations [51].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It uses JCS to verify the occurrence of events (categories) in each spatial unit within the study area classifying the cells in the event (B) and non-event (W) regions. The resulting regional combinations are clumps (groups of B cells sharing an edge); cluster (significant number of Bs and significant BB); outlier (significant number of non-B); dispersed (significant BW); outlier in the heterogeneous area (significant outlier with significant BW) (Carrer et al, 2021). In this research, LICD was used to address the local spatial associations between the UDUs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The R script Code, HLC dataset and PPA spatial covariates are available on Zenodo: https://doi.org/10.5281/ zenodo.5907229. For a detailed description of LICD, please refer to Carrer et al (2021) while for an exhaustive explanation of the use of PPA in landscape archaeology, consider the paper of Knitter and Nakoinz (2018).…”
Section: Disclosure Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%