2001
DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.00112.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional Levels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
211
1
13

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 247 publications
(230 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
5
211
1
13
Order By: Relevance
“…It is important to point that even for species widely distributed in the Atlantic Forest, such as P. corcovadense, P. cordatum and P. crassinervium, the regional status based on geographic distribution suggests these taxa as threatened in the state of Rio de Janeiro. Our work reinforces the need for regional lists for effective conservation practices (Gärdenfors et al 2001).…”
Section: Contribution Of Grumari Restinga To the Conservation Of Aracsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is important to point that even for species widely distributed in the Atlantic Forest, such as P. corcovadense, P. cordatum and P. crassinervium, the regional status based on geographic distribution suggests these taxa as threatened in the state of Rio de Janeiro. Our work reinforces the need for regional lists for effective conservation practices (Gärdenfors et al 2001).…”
Section: Contribution Of Grumari Restinga To the Conservation Of Aracsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…The AOO and EOO indexes refer to the distribution of a taxon in a given region: EOO corresponds to the area contained within the smallest convex polygon that can be drawn to include all known sites of occurrence of a taxon; AOO corresponds to the effective area within the EOO which is actually occupied by a taxon (IUCN 2010). This approach allowed us to assess conservation status at a regional level (Gärdenfors et al 2001) by applying IUCN (2010) assessment criteria, restricted to the state of Rio de Janeiro in this case. Each species was evaluated based on all the points surveyed for the state (List S1 in supplementary material), considering first the occurrence in Grumari restinga and then excluding it.…”
Section: Extent Of Occurrence and Area Of Occupancymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the species as a whole is classified as Least Concern globally, however, there are really endangered points in its habitat within some regions. When the global category is not the same as the national or regional category, the cases like this are defined in the literature, for example in (Gärdenfors et al 2001).…”
Section: The Risk Assessment Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Se basa en cuatro medidas principales concretas: 1) disminución poblacional en el tiempo; 2) área de distribución/ocupación; 3) tamaño poblacional; y 4) análisis cuantitativo de la probabilidad de extinción. No obstante, tales criterios también suelen utilizarse para calificar el índice de amenaza de las especies a escala regional, utilizando modificaciones y adecuaciones de los criterios previos y sus valores umbrales (Gärdenfors, 2001;Gärdenfors et al, 2001). Esta práctica ha sido utilizada en varios contextos nacionales (véase por ejemplo el Libro Rojo de las Aves de España; Madroño et al, 2004), aunque no está exenta de problemas debido a la subjetividad de su aplicación (Carrascal y Palomino, 2006 y referencias allí dadas), teniendo en cuenta el tamaño de la región analizada en relación con la extensión total del área de distribución de la especie, su posición geográfica dentro de ésta, la contribución de los efectivos poblacionales regionales al total mundial, provincianismo conservacionista, etc.…”
Section: Estado De Conservaciónunclassified