2016
DOI: 10.17116/kurort201658-13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The application of high-frequency and iTBS transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of spasticity in the patients presenting with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results are consistent with previous studies that have shown the efficacy of HF-rTMS [11] and iTBS [12,13] in the treatment of spasticity in patients with MS. In addition, the presence of an antispastic effect of HF-rTMS in patients with stroke, spinal trauma and cerebral palsy has been shown previously, as well as the effectiveness of iTBS in patients with stroke and spinal trauma [14,15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Our results are consistent with previous studies that have shown the efficacy of HF-rTMS [11] and iTBS [12,13] in the treatment of spasticity in patients with MS. In addition, the presence of an antispastic effect of HF-rTMS in patients with stroke, spinal trauma and cerebral palsy has been shown previously, as well as the effectiveness of iTBS in patients with stroke and spinal trauma [14,15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…For a long time, TMS has provided an indispensable neuroelectrophysiological method for the diagnosis and prognostic evaluation of many neurological diseases (Tremblay et al, 2019;Antczak et al, 2021). As a type of transcranial magnetic stimulation, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) plays a potential role in the treatment of MS, especially in improving fatigue and spasticity in patients with MS (Liu et al, 2019;Korzhova et al, 2018;Boutière et al, 2017;Korzhova et al, 2016;Abdelkader et al, 2013;Schippling et al, 2014). However, several recent studies contradicted the findings of previous studies (Dieguez-Varela et al, 2019;Gaede et al, 2018;Azin et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%