1996
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199606)17:6<441::aid-smj819>3.0.co;2-g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Application of Cluster Analysis in Strategic Management Research: An Analysis and Critique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
1,395
0
39

Year Published

1998
1998
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,844 publications
(1,440 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
6
1,395
0
39
Order By: Relevance
“…We divided the sample randomly into approximate halves by a computer. We obtained a similar pattern of cluster centroids of the subsamples to the original solution, providing evidence of internal consistency of the cluster solution (Ketchen & Shook 1996). 23 Although the Scheffe test is a very conservative procedure in terms of protesting against type I error (Stevens, 2009), all the 39 possible combinations in the 13 constructs are highly significant (p < 0.01).…”
Section: Validation Of Clustersmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…We divided the sample randomly into approximate halves by a computer. We obtained a similar pattern of cluster centroids of the subsamples to the original solution, providing evidence of internal consistency of the cluster solution (Ketchen & Shook 1996). 23 Although the Scheffe test is a very conservative procedure in terms of protesting against type I error (Stevens, 2009), all the 39 possible combinations in the 13 constructs are highly significant (p < 0.01).…”
Section: Validation Of Clustersmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…As shown in Fig. 3, for most PSFs series, the explained variances increase with k more rapidly for k < 3 than k > 3, which suggests that k = 3 is a good choice according to the elbow method (Ketchen and Shook 1996). Therefore, the number of clusters was assigned 3 for simplifying the technical explanation of the results, and a popular K-means algorithm (Hartigan and Wong 1979) was then used to perform an "ensemble" cluster analysis in order to obtain a reasonable classification.…”
Section: Cluster Analysismentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Within the field of segmentation research three main themes can broadly be identified: (1) research aiming at improving segmentation methodology (Aldenderfer & Blashfield, 1984;Bailey, 1994;Dolnicar & Leisch, 2000;Dolnicar & Leisch, 2004;Ketchen & Shook, 1996; To Segment or Not to Segment? An Investigation of Segmentation Strategy Success Under Varying Market Conditions Krieger & Green, 1996;Lilien & Rangaswamy, 2000;Mazanec & Strasser, 2000;Milligan & Cooper, 1985;Milligan, 1981;Myers & Tauber, 1977;Punj & Stewart, 1983;Thorndike, 1953;(2) research comparatively evaluating the usefulness of different kinds of segmentation bases (Abbey, 1979;Frank, Massy & Wind, 1972;Haley, 1968;Wedel & Kamakura, 1998;Wind, 1978), and (3) empirically based reports on applied segmentation studies (these segmentation applications dominate in terms of quantity, a summarising report including 243 studies of this kind published in academic journals is provided by Baumann, (2000) and Dolnicar, (2003).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%