The Application of an Analytic Element Model to Investigate Groundwater-Lake Interactions at Pretty Lake, Wisconsin

Simulation of lake–aquifer interaction at Lake Naivasha, Kenya using a three-dimensional flow model with the high conductivity technique and a DEM with bathymetry

“…The lake is simulated by specifying a high hydraulic conductivity for lake-volume grid cells; we call this the ''high-K'' technique. This method was used by others including Lee (1996), Hunt and Krohelski (1996), Anderson et al (2002), Chui and Freyberg (2008). This technique, coupled with a cell-rewetting approximation method was used to represent the lake in a simulation of flow in a shallow aquifer using threedimensional flow models.…”

Simulation of the Groundwater-Flow System in Pierce, Polk, and St. Croix Counties, Wisconsin

“…In GFLOW modeling, the analytic elements are two-dimensional and are used only to simulate steady-state conditions (that is, groundwater levels do not vary with time). Comparisons of analytic element to finite-difference numerical modeling techniques are given in Hunt and Krohelski (1996); . MODFLOW-2000 (Harbaugh andothers, 2000), a USGS block-centered, finite-difference code, was used to simulate the three-dimensional flow system in the regional and inset models.…”

Numerical simulation of ground-water flow in La Crosse County, Wisconsin, and into nearby pools of the Mississippi River

“…In the GFLOW model used here, the analytic elements are two-dimensional and are used only to simulate steady-state conditions (that is, ground-water levels do not vary with time). A comparison of analytic element to finite-difference numerical modeling techniques is discussed in Hunt and Krohelski (1996) and Hunt and others (1998a;1998b).…”