The Application of a Model of Adaptive Performance to Army Leader Behaviors

Tucker, Jennifer S.; Gunther, Katie; Pleban, Robert J.; Goodwin, Gregory A.; Vaughan, Adam W.

doi:10.1037/e500742012-001

Cited by 5 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 10 publications

(26 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…There are numerous names referring to motivation to learn in the literature: “passionate learner” (Tucker, Gunther, Pleban, Goodwin, & Vaughn, 2007), “mastery orientation” (Dweck & Leggett, 1988; White et al, 2005), and “lifetime entrepreneur” (Breuer & Eugster, 2006). White et al (2005) described these individuals as viewing experiences as challenges from which to learn and grow.…”

Section: Components Of Operational and Strategic Cognitive Readinessmentioning

confidence: 99%

Military Cognitive Readiness at the Operational and Strategic Levels

Grier

2012

Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Military cognitive readiness is a somewhat new concept that has been defined many ways. In this article, I review these definitions and propose that cognitive readiness is not just one construct, but three inter-related constructs akin to the military levels of war and readiness (tactical, operational, & strategic). Each of these constructs requires cognitive performance in complex, uncertain, and stressful military operations. However, the nature of performance is different for each. Thus, each level of cognitive readiness requires different measures. As a first step in the development of measures for operational and strategic cognitive readiness, a review of research related to predicting cognitive performance in complex, uncertain, and stressful operations was conducted. From this review a set of inherent psychological factors and their measures were identified. The article concludes by indicating what future steps are needed to develop measures of both operational and strategic readiness.

show abstract

Section: Components Of Operational and Strategic Cognitive Readinessmentioning

confidence: 99%

Military Cognitive Readiness at the Operational and Strategic Levels

Grier

2012

Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…32 As we noted, these briefings can also foster team adaptation by creating opportunities for teams to discuss contingency plans in the case of unexpected events. 33 In medical contexts, one-to fourminute structured brie ngs involving a checklist of operations and communication points identi ed by nurses, surgeons, trainees, and anesthesiologists reduced communication failures (for example, failing to provide, or delaying the provision of, useful information) by 64 percent. 34 Such results suggest that CSIRTs could bene t from structured briefings that emphasize team communication breakdown points prior to incident response and during hando s.…”

Section: Enhance Communication Among Csirt Membersmentioning

confidence: 99%

Improving Cybersecurity Incident Response Team Effectiveness Using Teams-Based Research

Steinke

Bolunmez

Fletcher

et al. 2015

IEEE Secur. Privacy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This study provides validation of the eight-dimension model and demonstrates its ability to effectively measure adaptability and predict performance. Tucker, Gunther, Pleban, Goodwin, and Vaughn (2007) used the Pulakos, Arad, Donovan, and Plamondon (2000) eight-dimension model of adaptability to identify and define junior Army leader behaviors that are reflective of adaptive performance. In addition to the eight dimensions, the research also included "leads an adaptable team" (White et al, 2005).…”

Section: Environmental Understandingmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In addition to the eight dimensions, the research also included "leads an adaptable team" (White et al, 2005). Tucker et al (2007) examined two datasets of critical incident interviews on adaptive performance. The results highlight the frequency which behavioral examples of the dimensions were reported in the critical incidents.…”

Section: Environmental Understandingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Preparing Brigade Combat Team Soldiers for Mission Readiness Through Research on Intangible Psychological Constructs and Their Applications: Phase 1

Aude¹,

Bryson²,

Keller-Glaze³

et al. 2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This research consisted of two phases. In the initial phase, covered in this report, emphasis was placed on identification of psychological constructs that were determined to be critical for operational units as they prepared to deploy. To support the research objectives, a comprehensive literature review including academic and military sources was conducted and approximately one hundred Soldiers and leaders were interviewed. Several meta-constructs were identified, each of which had multiple sub-constructs embedded within them. Interviews with Soldiers and leaders assisted in reducing the list to those intangibles most critical to mission readiness and identifying training gaps related to the criticality and effectiveness of the relevant intangibles. This identification assisted the second phase of this research that focused on instrument development and identification of effective learning methods; the second phase is covered in a second report. See also ARI

show abstract

The Application of a Model of Adaptive Performance to Army Leader Behaviors

Cited by 5 publications

References 10 publications

Military Cognitive Readiness at the Operational and Strategic Levels

Military Cognitive Readiness at the Operational and Strategic Levels

Improving Cybersecurity Incident Response Team Effectiveness Using Teams-Based Research

Preparing Brigade Combat Team Soldiers for Mission Readiness Through Research on Intangible Psychological Constructs and Their Applications: Phase 1

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About