1984
DOI: 10.1002/j.1551-8833.1984.tb05454.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Application and Effectiveness of Slow Sand Filtration in the United States

Abstract: An aerial view of the Kassler slow-rate sand filtration plant shows the six basins with one basin emptied for scraping. This plant has served the Denver Water Department for more than 80 years.A survey of 27 slow sand filtration plants in the United States indicated that most of these plants are currently serving communities of fewer than 10 000 persons, are more than 50 years old, and are effective and inexpensive to operate. A slow sand filtration research facility in Logan, Utah, was compared with the opera… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, in each experimental replicate, a new layer of washed sand was added to the filter to prevent the buildup of a microbiological oxidation layer on the top of the sand bed. An examination of slow sand filtration facilities across the U.S. demonstrated that 90% of the facilities reported effluent COLIF levels of 1 or less per 100 mL, and that most of facilities used postchlorination for disinfection of filter effluents (Slezak and Sins, 1984).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, in each experimental replicate, a new layer of washed sand was added to the filter to prevent the buildup of a microbiological oxidation layer on the top of the sand bed. An examination of slow sand filtration facilities across the U.S. demonstrated that 90% of the facilities reported effluent COLIF levels of 1 or less per 100 mL, and that most of facilities used postchlorination for disinfection of filter effluents (Slezak and Sins, 1984).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to its efficiency and low cost, SSF is still considered an effective and inexpensive way to provide clean drinking water in lessdeveloped countries with limited water resources. SSF is recognized by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and WHO as an inexpensive and reliable way to improve safe drinking water [5,6]. Therefore, this method is still used in rural areas and even in some larger cities of the world to provide the population with good quality drinking water [7].…”
Section: Of 16mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extensive research has been performed on the efficiency of carbon-soil-sand filters for treatment of water in normal climates. When source waters are relatively low in temperature and turbidity, this process has been found to be effective in the removal of toxic elements, organics and bacteria (Bellamy et al, 2006, Slezak andSims , 1984). Tropical rivers and other surface waters, which serve as receiving waters for waste discharges and runoff, also serve as water supplies for downstream communities.…”
Section: Microbiological Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%