2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The applicability of computer simulation using Monte Carlo techniques in windfarm profitability analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This literature has a long tradition of exploring the effective and efficient use of knowledge-management systems (e.g., Chow et al, 2005;Gunasekaran & Ngai, 2007), and given the importance of knowledge for opportunity identification and exploitation, it seems reasonable to assume that such systems can complement the entrepreneurial process. In addition, the more recent development of systems based on artificial intelligence (e.g., Kuo et al, 2002;Pinson et al, 1997) and simulation techniques (e.g., Kull & Closs, 2008;Montes et al, 2011;Song & Kim, 2001) can provide tools that (corporate) entrepreneurs can use to make better decisions in terms of both creating optimal outputs for the firm and matching decision makers' preferences to potential opportunities. However, few entrepreneurship scholars have studied the (potential) role of these computer-based systems in the entrepreneurial process or their complementarities and interactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This literature has a long tradition of exploring the effective and efficient use of knowledge-management systems (e.g., Chow et al, 2005;Gunasekaran & Ngai, 2007), and given the importance of knowledge for opportunity identification and exploitation, it seems reasonable to assume that such systems can complement the entrepreneurial process. In addition, the more recent development of systems based on artificial intelligence (e.g., Kuo et al, 2002;Pinson et al, 1997) and simulation techniques (e.g., Kull & Closs, 2008;Montes et al, 2011;Song & Kim, 2001) can provide tools that (corporate) entrepreneurs can use to make better decisions in terms of both creating optimal outputs for the firm and matching decision makers' preferences to potential opportunities. However, few entrepreneurship scholars have studied the (potential) role of these computer-based systems in the entrepreneurial process or their complementarities and interactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The payoffs for entrepreneurial action include, exploiting a potential opportunity and being right, exploiting a potential opportunity and being wrong, not exploiting a potential opportunity and being right, and not exploiting a potential opportunity and being wrong. For example, operations management research has drawn on simulation techniques for profitability analysis (Montes, Martin, Bayo, & Garcia, 2011;Song & Kim, 2001) and has analyzed the consequences of supply chain failures (Kull & Closs, 2008). Perhaps these systems can serve as a basis for developing simulation processes for the type I and type II errors resulting from exploiting a potential opportunity.…”
Section: Operations Management Of Opportunity Identification and Evalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The IRR is a metric used in the capital budget to estimate the profitability of the potential investments [34]. The IRR is a discount rate that makes the net present value (NPV) [35] of all cash flows of a project zero [15].…”
Section: Internal Rate Of Returnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impacts of stochastic variables on the values of international OG projects are studied, therefore the probabilistic model can overcome the inherent defects of the traditional NPV model. The Monte Carlo Simulation method can comprehensively measure and analyze the stochastic characters of risk factors of international OG projects, therefore it is proper to apply the Monte Carlo Simulation method to measure the impacts of uncertain factors (Falconett and Nagasaka 2010;Montes et al 2011;Welkenhuysen et al 2017).…”
Section: Probabilistic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%