2018
DOI: 10.1111/mpp.12674
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The apparent non‐host resistance of Ethiopian mustard to a radish‐infecting strain of Turnip mosaic virus is largely determined by the C‐terminal region of the P3 viral protein

Abstract: Two different isolates of Turnip mosaic virus (TuMV: UK 1 and JPN 1) belonging to different virus strains were tested on three different Brassica species, namely turnip (Brassica rapa L.), Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.) and Ethiopian mustard (Brassica carinata A. Braun). Although all three hosts were readily infected by isolate UK 1, isolate JPN 1 was able to establish a visible systemic infection only in the first two. Ethiopian mustard plants showed no local or systemic symptoms, and no virus antigens c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(57 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, not only the different subcellular behavior of the P3 protein, but also the different impact of the infections on plant development and/or SCW formation discussed in this paper happen. Non-host resistance range also differs between strains (Sardaru et al, 2018), and recent important differences have been recently described for the interaction of the P1 viral protein with the host protein G3BP-2, leading to relevant differences in the formation of stress granules (Reuper and Krenz, 2021). How these relevant differences in the biology of intimate interactions with the host should be taken into account for the taxonomical differentiation between strains of viral species, will need to be considered in the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, not only the different subcellular behavior of the P3 protein, but also the different impact of the infections on plant development and/or SCW formation discussed in this paper happen. Non-host resistance range also differs between strains (Sardaru et al, 2018), and recent important differences have been recently described for the interaction of the P1 viral protein with the host protein G3BP-2, leading to relevant differences in the formation of stress granules (Reuper and Krenz, 2021). How these relevant differences in the biology of intimate interactions with the host should be taken into account for the taxonomical differentiation between strains of viral species, will need to be considered in the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All these P3‐mediated processes are influenced by determinants in the P3 C‐terminal region. We also recently identified a molecular motif within this region as determinant of the apparent nonhost resistance of Ethiopian mustard to the JPN 1 isolate (Sardaru et al ., 2018). All these findings provided an adequate context for P3 comparisons of two TuMV isolates (UK1 and JPN 1) having differential effects on Arabidopsis development.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In analyzing the resistance phenotype to TuMV in Ethiopian mustard, with infection by a pathotype 1 strain (UK1) of TuMV and apparent non-infection by a pathotype 7 isolate (JPN1), the resistance was associated with restricted systemic movement and absence of symptoms. The restricted vs. resistance-breaking phenotype mapped to the C-terminal region of the P3 protein, with a major determinant being amino acids 1099 and 1100 of the polyprotein, equivalent to amino acids 279 and 280 of the P3 protein (Sardaru et al, 2018). These changes in phenotype may be due, in part, to the same amino acid pairs (Lys-Met vs. Thr-Ile) at positions 279 and 280, respectively, appearing to be involved in the ability to infect radish (Suehiro et al, 2004), with Thr-Ile leading to restricted infection of Ethiopian mustard, and Lys-Met leading to the inability to infect radish.…”
Section: B Carinatamentioning
confidence: 99%