International Schools, Teaching and Governance 2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-46783-2_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Apparatuses of Conflict

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Savva, 2015) for being ‘insufficiently nuanced to capture this group’s motivations and identities’ (Bailey & Cooker, 2019, p. 129). Fortunately, the last few years have seen a growing interest in the lives and experiences of teachers in international schools (Arber et al, 2014; Bailey, 2015; Blyth, 2017; Bunnell, 2016, 2017), which could be likened to something of an international school teacher turn in the field of international education. Of particular note is how this literature has explored the positive and negative experiences of working in international schools by appropriating the constructs of the Global Middle Class (Tarc, Tarc & Wu, 2019) and the precariat (Bunnell, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Savva, 2015) for being ‘insufficiently nuanced to capture this group’s motivations and identities’ (Bailey & Cooker, 2019, p. 129). Fortunately, the last few years have seen a growing interest in the lives and experiences of teachers in international schools (Arber et al, 2014; Bailey, 2015; Blyth, 2017; Bunnell, 2016, 2017), which could be likened to something of an international school teacher turn in the field of international education. Of particular note is how this literature has explored the positive and negative experiences of working in international schools by appropriating the constructs of the Global Middle Class (Tarc, Tarc & Wu, 2019) and the precariat (Bunnell, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This teacher type resonates with findings from my own research into non-qualified international school teachers in Chinese Internationalised Schools who became international school teachers as a means to an end, or out of sheer economic necessity, being unable to find comparable employment in their home countries (Poole, 2019b). The economic benefits of being employed in international schools are balanced by increasing precarity, such as short-term contracts (Bunnell, 2016), little or no recourse to representation in contract disputes (Blythe, 2017), and the psychological effects of living away from one’s home country for an extended sojourn, such as a sense of permanent liminality and feelings of self-doubt that can manifest as a loss of self-efficacy in relation to one’s teaching practice (Poole, 2019a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the main premise of that paper, that some types of teacher (mainly native English-speaking and Western-trained) are seemingly preferred to others in international school recruitment, implied a degree of positive discrimination that still warrants attention, and some theorisation. Recent comment about the ‘White Anglophone hegemony’ (Savva, 2017: 583) shows that the topic is still ripe for critical discussion, as does recent auto-ethnographical evidence (Blyth, 2017). The issue of differential contracts and the differing, hierarchical treatment of ‘local’ and ‘expatriate’ teachers has been raised (Hayden and Thompson, 2020: 3) as one that needs a re-think, whilst Hatch (2020: 12) has recently argued the case for revisiting differentiated contracts and preferential perks in favour of ‘overseas hire’ educators (what he calls the ‘elephant in the room’) in international schools.…”
Section: The Historical Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%