2016
DOI: 10.1002/asna.201612387
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Apache Point Observatory Galactic Evolution Experiment (APOGEE) and its successor, APOGEE‐2

Abstract: The Apache Point Observatory Galactic Evolution Experiment (APOGEE) of Sloan Digital Sky Survey III (SDSS-III) has produced a large catalog of high resolution (R = 22 500), high quality (S/N > 100), infrared (H-band) spectra for stars throughout all stellar populations of the Milky Way, including in regions veiled by significant dust opacity. APOGEE's half million spectra collected on > 163 000 unique stars, with time series information via repeat visits to each star, are being applied to numerous problems in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

4
64
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(46 reference statements)
4
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…involving C, N), whenever no high-resolution spectroscopy was available for the particular cluster. For the OCs, we only considered a subsample: the two old, massive OCs Berkeley 39 and NGC 6791 3 observed and analyzed homogeneously by us , five OCs in the Gaia-ESO Survey (Gilmore et al 2012), one in APOGEE (Majewski et al 2016), and four more from different groups. While not exhaustive, the OC list comprises only clusters in which large samples of stars were analysed; for more data on OCs and MPs, see MacLean et al (2015); Krause et al (2016).…”
Section: Age and Mass Limits For Multiple Populationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…involving C, N), whenever no high-resolution spectroscopy was available for the particular cluster. For the OCs, we only considered a subsample: the two old, massive OCs Berkeley 39 and NGC 6791 3 observed and analyzed homogeneously by us , five OCs in the Gaia-ESO Survey (Gilmore et al 2012), one in APOGEE (Majewski et al 2016), and four more from different groups. While not exhaustive, the OC list comprises only clusters in which large samples of stars were analysed; for more data on OCs and MPs, see MacLean et al (2015); Krause et al (2016).…”
Section: Age and Mass Limits For Multiple Populationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The APOGEE-2 survey (Majewski et al 2016), part of SDSS-IV (2014-2020; Blanton et al 2017), expands and significantly enhances the original APOGEE sample, with the key addition of a second spectrograph at Las Campanas Observatory (LCO) to make a unique all-sky H-band spectroscopic survey. APOGEE-2 thus comprises two complementary components: APOGEE-2 North (APOGEE-2N), using the Sloan Foundation 2.5 m telescope at APO (Gunn et al 2006) and original APOGEE spectrograph (Wilson et al 2012), and APOGEE-2 South (APOGEE-2S), using the du Pont 2.5 m telescope at LCO and a cloned spectrograph.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many galactic surveys which resolve the chemical compositions and kinematic information of a lot of stars, e.g., RAVE (Steinmetz et al 2006), APOGEE (Majewski et al 2016), Gaia-ESO (Gilmore et al 2012), HERMES (GRASH) (De Silva et al 2015). The data obtained by these surveys can make a strong constraint on the formation and evolution of the Milky Way galaxy and thus, it becomes a clue to understanding the formation and evolution of galaxies in general.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%